期刊文献+

基于复杂度分级的航天员操作训练方法研究 被引量:2

Research on Method of Astronauts' Operation Training Based on Complexity Classification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不同复杂度水平操作训练任务下志愿者使用不同训练方法后的绩效差异,为提高航天员操作训练效率提供依据。方法 9名志愿者进行高、中、低3种复杂度水平,常规、回馈和整合3种训练方法,共18个模拟航天操作单元操作训练。分别对初训阶段和复训阶段的不同任务复杂度水平下,3种训练方法间志愿者平均操作时间和操作错误数进行比较。结果 1)初训阶段,不同任务复杂度水平下,志愿者应用3种方法训练后的操作绩效间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。2)复训阶段,对于中、低复杂度水平的操作任务,不同训练方法下志愿者的平均操作时间和错误数之间均无显著性差异(P>0.05);对于高复杂度水平的操作任务,不同训练方法下志愿者的平均操作时间和错误数之间差异显著(P=0.005和P<0.001),且回馈和整合训练方法下志愿者的平均操作时间和错误数均明显少于常规训练方法(P<0.05)。结论回馈和整合训练方法更适用于高复杂度水平的操作任务训练,低复杂度水平的操作任务训练,使用常规训练方法即可。 Objective To provide a basis for improving the effectiveness of astronauts' operation training by comparing the participants' performance after using different training methods in operation training tasks with different complexity levels. Methods Nine participants performed 18 spacecraft operation units being divided into 3 complexity levels by using routine training method, feedback training method and integrated training method. The average operation times and operation errors of operation tasks of different complexity levels at the first training stage and at the final training stage by using different training methods were compared. Results 1 ) At the first training stage, no significant difference of operation performance existed among these three training methods with regard to operations of different complexity levels (P 〉 O. 05 ). 2) At the final training stage, there was no significant difference of the average operation time and errors among these three training methods with regard to operations of middle and low complexity level ( P 〉 0.05 ). However, the difference of the average operation time and errors among these three training methods with regard to operations of high com- plexity level was significant (P =0. 005 and P 〈0. 001 ). The average operation time and errors by using feed- back training method and integrated training method was significantly less than those by using routine training method (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Feedback training method and integrated training method are more suitable for operation training of high complexity level. For operation training of low complexity level, routine training method is suitable.
出处 《航天医学与医学工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期471-474,共4页 Space Medicine & Medical Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71001092) 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2011CB711000) 中国航天员科研训练中心人因工程国防科技重点实验室自主研究项目(HF2011Z-Z-B-04)
关键词 航天员 操作复杂度 操作训练方法 操作绩效 复杂度分级 astronauts operation complexity operation training methods operation performance complexity classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献55

共引文献103

同被引文献32

  • 1王登峰.心理控制源期望的认知-知识系统模型[J].心理学报,1996,28(1):70-75. 被引量:35
  • 2杨家忠,张侃.情境意识的理论模型、测量及其应用[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):842-850. 被引量:42
  • 3吴国兴.航天事故中的人为失误分析[J].国际太空,2005(2):18-20. 被引量:3
  • 4柳忠起,袁修干,刘伟,康卫勇,韩彦东,马锐.基于模拟飞行任务下的眼动指标分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(2):47-51. 被引量:28
  • 5Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynam- ic systems[J]. Human Factors, 1995, 37(1 ) : 32-64.
  • 6Endsley MR. Errors in situation assessment: Implications for system design [ C ].//Elzer PF, Kluwe RH, Boussoffara PF. Human error and system design and management. London: Springer, 2000:15 -26.
  • 7Endsley MR. Situation awareness and human error: Designing to support human performance[ C ].//Proceedings of the High Cnsequeuce S3;tem Suretr Cerence, A.huquerque, NM, 1999.
  • 8Paloski W, Oman C, Bloomberg J, et al. Risk of sensory-mo- tor performance failures affecting vehicle control during space missions : a review of the evidence [ J ]. Journal of Gravitation- al Physiology, 2008, 15(2) : 1-29.
  • 9Kirlik A, Strauss R. Situation awareness as judgment I: Sta- tistical modeling and quantitative measurement [ J ]. Interna- tional Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2006,36 : 463-474.
  • 10Hooey BL,Gore BF, Wickens CD. Modeling pilot situation awareness[ C].//Cacciabue PC, Hjitlmdahl M, Luedtke A, et al. Human Modeling in Assisted Transportation. Springer Milan, 2011: 207-213.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部