期刊文献+

我国公立三甲医院绩效考核体系的研究 被引量:8

Study on Performance Appraisal System of the Third Grade A Hospital
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以公立三甲医院为研究对象,建立一套科学、实用性强、易于推广的医院绩效考核体系。通过以平衡计分卡法、KPI法、目标管理法和利益相关者模型为理论基础,综合采用文献参考法、专家咨询法、实地调查法以及关联分析和差异分析进行指标集的筛选和构建。利用层次分析法和熵权法进行权重的确定,根据加权TOPSIS综合评价法和目标参照法、比较法、区间法、加分发、减分法等具体评分方法综合计算最终的评价结果。结合当前我国医院绩效考核关注的核心问题有针对性地进行我国公立三甲医院绩效考核体系的构建。通过实证分析证明了所建绩效考核体系的科学性和实用性。构建的思路和方法可以为卫生行政管理部门和三甲医院自身绩效考核体系的设计提供参考。 With the third grade A hospital as the research object, a set of scientific, practi- cal, easy to promote the hospital performance appraisal system is established. By using the balanced scorecard method, the KPI method, the target management and the stakeholder model as the theoretical basis, and comprehensively adopting the documentary reference method, the Delphi method, the field survey, the association analysis and the variation analy- sis, index set is screened and constructed. Weight is calculated by taking advantage of the AHP and the entropy method. According to method, the comparative method, the interval the weighted TOPSIS and the target reference method, the bonus method, the reduction meth- od, the final evaluation results are calculated. At the same time, combined with the core is- sues of the current performance appraisal of the public hospital, the performance appraisal system of the third grade A hospital is targeted to set up. The empirical analysis shows that the performance evaluation system is scientific and practical. The design idea and the meth- od of construction can provide reference for the health administrative departments and the hospital's performance appraisal system.
机构地区 沈阳理工大学
出处 《沈阳理工大学学报》 CAS 2014年第1期66-70,共5页 Journal of Shenyang Ligong University
关键词 公立三甲医院 绩效考核体系 指标集 实证分析 the third grade a public hospital performance appraisal system index set the empirical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献20

  • 1蔡志明,王琦,王光明,陈春涛,卢祖询.医院绩效评估与绩效管理[J].中国医院,2005,9(2):42-46. 被引量:81
  • 2庄霞,尹爱田,任绪功,李文.构建综合医院绩效评价关键指标体系的研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(5):341-344. 被引量:110
  • 3] A review of the determinants of hospital performance[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization Hospital Advisory Group,1994.
  • 4Gould M.NHS star rating system is misleading, statisticians say[J]. BMJ. 2003,327(7422):1008.
  • 5Hurst J, M Jec-Hughes. Performance measuremeni and performance management in OECD health[Z]. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, 2001.
  • 6Berg M, Gras Y. Feasibility first: Developing public peribrmanee indicators on patient safety and clinical effectiveness for Dutch hospitals[J]. Health Policy, 2005(75):59-73.
  • 7The National Health Performance Committee. National Health Per- formance framework report[R]. Brisbane:Queensland Heahh,2001. What makes PATH different?[EB/OL].[2010-12-25].http://www pathqualityproject.eu/what_makes_path_different.htrnl.
  • 8What makes PATH different?[EB/OL].[2010-12-25].http://www. pathqualityproject.eu/what_makes_path_different.html.
  • 9卫生部,中央编办,国家发展改革委,等.关于印发公立医院改革试点指导意见的通知[EB/OL].(2010-02-23).ht-tp://www/moh.gov/cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfies/mohylfwjgs/s3582/201002/46062/htm.
  • 10Veillard J, Champagne F, Klazinga N, et al. A perform- ance assessment framework for hospital: the WHO re- gional office for Europe PATH project[J]. International journal for quality in Health Care, 2005,17(6) :487-496.

共引文献74

同被引文献54

引证文献8

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部