期刊文献+

第六次科技革命给生命伦理学带来的挑战与发展机遇 被引量:2

The Sixth Scientific and Technological Revolution Brings Challenges and Opportunities for Bioethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学界预见第六次科技革命即将在未来10年左右的时间内到来,这场新科技革命也被称为是一次新生物学革命,将对人类社会的诸多方面产生影响。其也将对生命伦理学带来冲击和挑战:生命的概念需要重新定义,生命神圣性需要重新认识,家庭与生育的观念应更新,婚姻的社会意义需要反思,人为干预生命的伦理制衡,重新审视性别的价值属性。对这些挑战进行分析并提出对策:加强新科技革命对生命伦理学冲击和影响的理论探索,亟需对生命伦理学现有原则和规范进行全面梳理与界定,尽快建立顺应新科技革命发展要求的生命伦理学新框架,与时俱进树立与新科技革命相适应的非自然进化生命观,在突破新科技革命带来的生命伦理困境中建构新的哲学理念。 Scientific community predicts that the sixth scientific and technological revolution will come within ten years, which is also known as a new biological revolution and will certainly produce numerous significant impacts and challenges for human society as well as Bioethics : the concept of life need to be redefined, sanctity of life need to be re - recognized, the idea of family and fertility should be updated, the social significance of marriage need to be reflected, ethics of the intervention of life need to be discussed, the value of the gender attributes also need to be re - examined. The authors put forward countermeasures: strengthening the theory exploration of new revolution of science and technology on ethics and bioethics, urgently define the existing principles of Bioethics, establish new life ethical framework, set up a non - natural evolution viewpoint and construct new philosophy while in the breakthrough of ethical dilemma caused by new technology revolution.
出处 《中国医学伦理学》 2013年第6期687-690,共4页 Chinese Medical Ethics
关键词 第六次科技革命 生命伦理学 生命观 理论探索 The Sixth Scientific and Technological Revolution Bioethics View of Life Theoretical Exploration
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1何传启.第六次科技革命的机遇与对策--从人类文明与世界现代化的角度看科技革命[N]科学时报,2011.
  • 2刘恕;徐元季.钱学森论第六次产业革命通信集[M]{H}北京:中国环境科学出版社,20016.
  • 3Langton C.G. Artificial Life[A].London:Addison-Wesley,1989.
  • 4Sanford.K. Life and rights in the criminallaw[A].The Johns Hopkins University Press,1976.63-101.
  • 5杨磊,翟晓梅.合成生命的伦理问题及其管理建议[J].中国医学伦理学,2012,25(3):273-276. 被引量:5

二级参考文献10

  • 1翟晓梅,邱仁宗.合成生物学的伦理与管治[N].科学时报,2010-07-16(A3).
  • 2U.S. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bio- ethical Issues [ R ]. Washington DC, New direc- tions: the Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies, 2010, 3.
  • 3张新庆,邱仁宗.合成生命的伦理问题及其社会规制[R]//中国科学院.2011高技术发展报告.北京:科学出版社,2011:266-274.
  • 4Henk B. Playing God in Frankenstein' s Footsteps:Synthetic Biology and the Meaning of Life [ J ]. Nano - ethics ,2009,3 (3) :257 - 268.
  • 5Eggers, J. , et al. Is Biofuel Policy Harming Biodi- versity in Europe? [ J ]. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2009,1 ( 1 ) : 18 - 34.
  • 6Stephen A. , et al. Scenarios for the Future of Syn- thetic Biology[J]. Industrial Biotechnology,2008,4 (1) :39 -49.
  • 7Henkel J, Maurer S M. The Economics of Synthetic Biology Molecular Systems [ J ]. Biology, 2007,3 (117) :1 -4.
  • 8Wikipedia. Precautionary Principle [ EB/OL ]. ht- tp ://en. wikipedia, org/wiki/ Precautionary prin- ciple ,2012 - 04 - 10.
  • 9王学健.如何让合成生物学不重蹈转基因覆辙?[N].科学时报,2010-07-20(A1).
  • 10Pauwels E, Ifrim I. Trends in American and Eu- ropean Press Coverage of Synthetic Biology:Track- ing the last Five Years of Coverage [ J ]. Synthetic Biology Project, 2008, (28) : 1 - 33.

共引文献4

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部