期刊文献+

限制性液体复苏抢救非控制性失血性休克临床观察 被引量:15

Clinical observation of limited fluid resuscitation on preoperative uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨限制性液体复苏在抢救创伤非控制性失血性休克中的价值。方法创伤非控制性失血性休克患者114例随机分为限制性液体复苏组(观察组)和积极液体复苏组(对照组)各57例,比较2组术前输液量、病死率、血红蛋白、血小板计数、凝血酶原时间、血气剩余碱及并发症发生率。结果对照组病死率(15.79%)高于观察组(10.53%)(P<0.05),并发症发生率(29.17%)高于观察组(21.57%)(P<0.05);术前剩余碱对照组((215±87)mmol/L)较观察组((272±93)mmol/L)减少(P<0.05),对照组凝血酶原时间((14.5±1.8)s)较观察组((12.3±1.7)s)延长(P<0.05)。结论术前急救采用限制性液体复苏可维持重要器官血流灌注,降低早期大量输液导致的并发症,降低病死率。 Objective To evaluate the effect of limited fluid resuscitation on uncontrolled traumatic hemorrhagic shock and its clinical value. Methods A total of 114 patients with uncontrolled traumatic hemorrhagic shock were randomly divided into limited fluid resuscitation group (experimental group) and active fluid resuscitation group (control group), with 57 cases in each group. These two groups were compared the preoperative transfusion quantity, fatality rate, hemoglobin, platelet count, prothrombin time, base excess and incidence rate of complications. Results The fatality rate and incidence rate of complications were 15.79% and 29. 17% in control group, higher than those in experiment group (10.53% and 21.57%) (P〈0.05). The preoperative base excess was (215±87) mmol/L in control group, lower than that in experiment group ((272±93) mmol/L) (P〈0, 05). The prothrombin time was (14.5±1.8)s in control group, longer than that in experiment group ((12. 3 ±1. 7)s) (P〈0. 05). Conclusions Limited fluid resuscitation in preoperative emergency treatment can maintain the blood perfusion in important organs and reduce the complications caused by a great quantity of transfusion in the early period so as to improve the prognosis and reduce the fatality rate.
出处 《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》 2014年第1期51-52,共2页 Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
关键词 失血性休克 液体复苏 限制性 Hemorrhagic shock fluid resuscitation limited
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献68

共引文献47

同被引文献108

  • 1梅建民.高渗盐水右旋糖酐液抗失血性休克机理的研究进展[J].国外医学(创伤与外科基本问题分册),1994,15(1):10-12. 被引量:15
  • 2刘秋洁.温热疗法在失血性休克抢救中的作用[J].中国急救医学,2005,25(6):468-468. 被引量:13
  • 3Krausz MM, Hirsh M. Bolus versus continuous fluid resuscitation and splenectomy for treatment of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after massive splenic injury[J]. J Trauma, 2003,55 (1) :62-68.
  • 4Xiao N, Wang XC, Diao YF, et al. Effect of initial fluid resuscita- tion on subsequent treatment in uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in rats[J]. Shock, 2004,21 (3) :276-280.
  • 5Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, et al. " Damage con- trot" : an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating pene- trating abdominal injury [ J ]. J Trauma, 1993,35 ( 3 ) : 375-383.
  • 6Balogh ZJ, van Wessem K, Yoshino, et al. Postinjmy abdominal compartment syndrome: are we winning the battle [ J ]. World J Surg, 2009,33 (6) : 1134-1141.
  • 7Stern S A, Dronen S C, Wang X. Multiple resuscitation regimens in a near-fatal porcine aortic injury hemorrhage model[J]. Acad Emerg Med, 2007,2(2) :89-97.
  • 8Wang Wen-juan,Lu Jing-jing, Yong-Jun.Clinical and functional outcomes in Chinese patients within the first year after intracerebral hemorrhage: analysis from China national stroke registry[J]. CNS Neurosci Ther,2012,18(9):773-780.
  • 9Butler F. Fluid resuscitation in tactical combat casualty care: brief history and current status. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infec-tion & Critical Care. 2011,70(5):s 1 l-s12.
  • 10Alam HB,Velmahos GC. Ne" trends in resuscitation. Ctrrr Probl Surg, 2011,48(8): 531-564.

引证文献15

二级引证文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部