摘要
康德善良意志的先天性起源于他的理性范畴论,这是个很奇怪的命题,既然是先天的,然而它又是可以分析的,那么康德的这种先天性原则的分析法是否就能证明其实践理性的完全合法性及其在现实的实践中的法则作用?这是需要加以认真探讨的话题。应该说,康德对休谟怀疑论的综合批判并没有从根本上消除道德与伦理的二元悖论,更没有在根本上澄清"是"与"应该"的经验与规范的二律背反,这种无休止的争论的谜团构成了康德自身的批判理论的永恒元素。但反过来说,善良意志的这种无法解决的矛盾,恰恰是其所具有的内在批判性所在,唯有如此,在其遭遇现实经验时才能具备自身的理论张力。
Congenital principle of Kant's good will originated from the rational aspects of his theo- ry, which is a very strange proposition. It is innate, but it can also be analyzed. Can Kant's con- genital principle prove its complete legitimacy and function in the real practice. This is a topic that needs to be seriously discussed. Admittedly, Kant's comprehensive criticism of Hume's kepticism does not eliminate the moral and ethical paradox fundamentally, nor clarifies the para- dox of experience and the norms of "yes" and "should". The endless argument constitutes the e- ternal elements of Kant's critical theory. But the contradiction of good will can't be solved, which is precisely what criticism is for. Only in this way, can good will show its own theoretical extension when it encounters the real experience.
出处
《唐山学院学报》
2014年第1期31-38,共8页
Journal of Tangshan University