基于广义论证的中国古代逻辑研究--以春秋赋诗论证为例

An Inquiry into Ancient Chinese Logic from the Viewpoint of the General Argumentation Theory

自20世纪初梁启超、胡适等人创立中国古代逻辑史学科以来，它所研究的基本问题是：中国古代是否存在逻辑？如果存在，它具有什么特点，是否与西方逻辑相同或类似？（参见崔清田主编，第1—33页；孙中原，第1—19页）为了解决这些问题，中国古代逻辑史家们采用“据西释中”的方法来整理、解释和重构中国古代逻辑。逻辑史家们百余年的工作在学科建设方面取得了重要成就，

It is more than 100 years since the history of Chinese logic has been founded as an academic discipline.For these years,the paradigm of 'interpretation of ancient Chinese logic based on western logic' always dominated the very research realm.Essentially,with presupposing the universality of ideas of western logic,the classical paradigm ignores the local features of ancient Chinese logic.However,according to the theory of general argumentation,the study of the history of ancient Chinese logic should be concentrated on a set of rules of social interaction with function of argumentation in ancient Chinese society,and we should describe the set from three aspects including cultural background,social context and social norms.On the case study of argumentation by chanting poems in the Spring and Autumn Period,we present the logic applied in this period and further reveal its local characteristics — to make argumentation by chanting poems,and to convince others by Li;thereby presenting a way of ' explaining the Chinese issues in Chinese manners' to study the history of ancient Chinese logic.