期刊文献+

红细胞分布宽度与感染性休克患者预后关系研究 被引量:17

Investigation of the relationship between red cell distribution width and the prognosis in patients with septic shock
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [摘要]目的探讨红细胞分布宽度(RDW)与感染性休克患者预后的关系。方法回顾性调查2010—06~2012—12人住本院重症医学科符合研究条件的感染性休克患者的病例资料,包括入科当日急性生理和慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)及序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA),人科当日血小板(PLT)、血小板分布宽度(PDW)、白细胞计数(WBC)、红细胞比容(HCT)、平均红细胞体积(MCV)、血红蛋白(Hb),入科第1、2、3、5、7天RDW,以人科后28d生存情况分为死亡组和存活组。先通过t检验分析死亡危险因素,对有统计学意义的危险因素再用多因素Logistic回归模型分析死亡优势比(OR)。根据多元Logistic回归分析得出的权重对SOFA评分、APACHEⅡ评分及RDWl加权求和得出SOFA+RDWl、APACHEⅡ+RDWl,与SOFA评分、APACHEⅡ评分、RDWl单个指标分别应用ROC曲线对预测感染性休克患者ICU28d病死率的应用价值进行评价,分别计算其曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值。比较死亡组及存活组入科第1、2、3、5、7天RDW均值变化。结果Logistic回归分析显示,RDW回归系数为0.338,OR1.402(P=0.044,95%CI1.010—1.947),RDW每增加1%,ICU感染性休克患者28d死亡危险增加1.402倍;RDWl、APACHEⅡ评分、APACHEⅡ评分+RDWl、SOFA评分、SOFA评分+RDWl等指标对感染性休克患者28dICU病死率预测的AUC分别为0.632、0.802、0.817、0.852、0.841,敏感性分别为73.8%、87.7%、95.4%、70.8%、81.5%,阴性预测值分别为69.638%、84.942%、93.214%、74.723%、80.314%。死亡组第1、2、3、5、7天RDW均值逐步上升,而存活组均值变化无线性趋势。结论①RDW是ICU感染性休克患者28d病死率的独立危险因素;②RDW联合SOFA评分或APACHEⅡ评分均能提高预测ICU感染性休克患者28d病死率的敏感性;③RDW动态增高提示感染性休克患者预后不佳。 Objective To study the relationship between red cell distribution width (RDW) and prognosis in patients with septic shock. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with septic shock admitted to intensive care unit according with the enrollment condition from June 2010 to December 2012. The records included acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ( APACHE Ⅱ ) score, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) , PLT, PDW, WBC, HCT, MCV and Hb were collected on the first day of ICU. RDW on day 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 of ICU was noted as RDW1, RDW2, RDW3, RDW5 and RDW7, respectively. According to the survival situation within the 28 days of ICU, the patients were divided into death group and survival group. We analyzed the risk factors for death by t - test, then we used the significant risk factors to analyze death advantage ratio (OR) by multi - factor Logistic regression model. The SOFA + RDW1, APACHE I1 + RDW1, SOFA score, APACHE U score, RDW1 were applied by ROC curves to evaluate the 28 - day ICU mortality in patientswith septic shock, the area under the curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. The mean values of RDW1, RDW2, RDW3, RDW5 and RDW7 from death group and survival group were compared. Results Logistic regression analysis showed that the regression coefficient of RDW was 0. 338, odds ratio (OR) was 1. 402 (P = 0. 044, 95% CI 1.010 - 1. 947), for each additional 1% RDW, the risk of 28 days of patients with sepsis shock in ICU increased 1. 402 times; the AUC calculated by ROC for RDW1, APACHE Ⅱscore, APACHE Ⅱ + RDW1 SOFA score, SOFA + RDW1 with 28 - day ICU mortality in patients with septic shock were 0. 632, 0. 802, O. 817, O. 852 and 0. 841, the sensitivity were 73.8%, 87.7%, 95.4%, 70.8% and 81.5%, the negative predictive value were 69. 638%, 84. 942%, 93. 214%, 74. 723% and 80.314%. The mean RDW from day 1 to day 7 in death group was gradually increased, but was not in a linear trend in the survival group. Conclusion ①RDW is an independent risk factor of 28 - day ICU mortality in patients with septic shock; ②RDW combined with SOFA score or APACHE Ⅱ score improves the predict sensitivity of 28 -day ICU mortality in patients with septic shock; ③The increased RDW indicates a poor prognosis of septic shock.
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期31-34,共4页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
关键词 红细胞分布宽度(RDW) 感染性休克 序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA) 急性生理和慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ) 预后 ICU 28 d病死率 Red cell distribution width(RDW) Septic shock SOFA APACHE Ⅱ Prognosis 28 - day ICU mortality
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1商娜(综述),周荣斌(审校).脓毒症流行病学研究[J].中国急救医学,2013,33(1):8-12. 被引量:47
  • 2Kleinpellr M,Grabes BT,Ackerman MH. Incidence,pathogenesis,and management of sepsis:an overview[J].AACN Adv Crit Care,2006,(4):385-393.
  • 3Nguyen HB,Rivers EP,Abrahanian FM. Severe sepsis and septic shock:review of the literature an demergency department management guidelines[J].{H}Annals of Emergency Medicine,2006,(1):28-54.
  • 4PerlsteinTS,WeuveJ,PfefferMA. Red blood cell distribution width and mortality risk in a community-based prospective cohort[J].{H}Archives of Internal Medicine,2009,(6):588-594.
  • 5Lippi G,Targher G,Montagnana M. Relation between red blood cell distribution width and inflammatory biomarkers in a large cohort of unselected outpatients[J].{H}ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE,2009,(4):628-632.
  • 6Forhecz Z,Gombos T,Borgulya G. Red cell distribution width in heart failure:prediction of clinical events and relationship with markers of ineffective erythropoiesis,inflammation,renal function,and nutritional state[J].{H}American Heart Journal,2009,(4):659-666.
  • 7Mitchell M Levy,Mitchell P. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference[J].{H}CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE,2003,(4):1250-1256.
  • 8马丽娜(综述),冯明(审校).脓毒症炎症反应相关因子与预后[J].中国急救医学,2011,31(5):461-463. 被引量:7
  • 9Pierce CN,Larson DF. Inflammatory cytokine inhibition of erythropoiesis in patients implanted with a mechanical circulatory assist device[J].{H}PERFUSION,2005,(2):83-90.
  • 10Forhecz Z,Gombos T,Borgulya G. Red cell distribution width in heart failure:prediction of clinical events and relationship with markers of ineffective eiythropoiesis,inflammation,renal function,and nutritional state[J].{H}American Heart Journal,2009,(4):659-666.

二级参考文献58

  • 1吴健,李澎,陈卫民.血清C反应蛋白水平预测危重症患者预后的临床研究[J].中国医科大学学报,2007,36(3):358-358. 被引量:11
  • 2Christ-Crain M,Morgenthaler NG,Struck J,et al.Midregional pro-ADM as a prognostic marker in sepsis:an observational study[J].Crit Care,2005,9(6):816.
  • 3Inna Frolkisb,Yifat Kleina,Chaim Lockera,et al.Vipera aspis venom reduces lethality and down-regulates tumor necrosis factor-α in a rat model of LPS-induced sepsis[J].Cytokine,2010,49(3):319-324.
  • 4Esper A,Martin GS.Is severe sepsis increasing in incidence AND severity[J].Crit Care Med,2007,35(5):1414-1415.
  • 5Vincent JL,Sakr Y,Sprung CL,et al.Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ⅲ Patients Ⅰ.Sepsis in European intensive care units:results of the SOAP study[J].Crit Care Med,2006,34(2):344-353.
  • 6Gian PC,Claudio P,Michael M,et al.Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein during systemic inflammatory response syndrome,sepsis and organ dysfunction[J].Criti Care,2004,8(4):234-242.
  • 7Povoa P,Coelho L,Almeida E,et al.Early identification of intensive care unit-acquired infections with daily monitoring of C-reactive protein:a prospective observational study[J].Crit Care,2006,10(2):R63.
  • 8Castelli GP,Pognani C,Cita M,et al.Procalcitonin,C-reative protein,white blood cells and SOFA score in ICU:diagnosis and monitoring of sepses[J].Minerva Anestesiol,2006,72(1-2):69-80.
  • 9Rau BM,Frigerio I,Buchler MW,et al.Evaluation of procalcitonin for predicting septic multiorgan failure and overall prognosis in secondary peritonitis:a prospective,international multinational multicenter study[J].Arch Surg,2007,142(2):134-142.
  • 10Christ-Crain M,Stolz D,Bingisser R,et al.Procalcitonin guidance of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia:a randomized trial[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2006,174(1):84-93.

共引文献52

同被引文献158

引证文献17

二级引证文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部