期刊文献+

真空包装红肠在不同贮藏温度下微生物及理化性质变化研究 被引量:1

Influence of Storage Temperature and Duration on Microflora Changes and Physical and Chemical Properties of Vacuum-packaged Red Sausage
原文传递
导出
摘要 试验研究真空包装红肠在不同贮藏温度和贮藏时间,其微生物菌相及理化性质的变化。将红肠贮藏在4℃或室温(20℃±2℃)条件下,研究0 d,5 d,10 d和15 d菌落总数、乳酸菌、假单胞菌和葡萄球菌的变化,以及对红肠的感官、红色度(a*值)、亮度(L*值)、pH、硫代巴比妥酸值(TBARS)和质构特性的影响。室温红肠菌落总数和葡萄球菌在15 d显著多于4℃红肠(p<0.05)。乳酸菌和假单胞菌在15 d均未超过5.4 lg CFU/g。感官评定各项评分逐渐降低,a*和L*值基本保持不变。pH在15 d减小到了5.85左右,TBARS值逐渐增大。硬度和咀嚼性逐渐变大,弹性和黏聚性的变化不大。研究表明在贮藏末期(15 d)假单胞菌和乳酸菌成为了主要的优势腐败菌,红肠的品质逐渐下降。 The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of storage temperature and duration on microflora changes and physical and chemical properties of red sausage. The changes of the total number of colonies, lactic acid bacteria, Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus were studied, the sensory qualities, pH, thiobarbituricacid-reactivesubstances (TBARS), a* values, L* values, mad the physical properties of red sausage were also evaluated when the red sausage were stored at 4℃ or room temperature (20℃±2℃) for different duration (0 d, 5 d, 10 d and 15 d). The results indicated that the number of colonies and Staphylococci in red sausage stored at room temperature was significant higher than that stored at 4 ℃ (p〈0.05). The number of lactic acid bacteria and Pseudomonas was less than 5.41g CFU/g in 15 d. Meanwhile, the sensory qualities and pH value decreased gradually with increased storage time, a* value and L* value did not change too much. TBARS also increased (p〈0.05) with increased storage time. The hardness and chewiness rose gradually, while elasticity and cohesiveness showed a little change. The results revealed that Pseudomonas and lactic acid bacteria were dominated spoilage bacteria at 15 d of storage, the red sausage quality decreased with increased duration.
出处 《食品工业》 北大核心 2014年第1期180-185,共6页 The Food Industry
基金 国家十二五科技支撑计划(2012BAD28B02) 黑龙江省政府博士后科研启动金(LBH-Q12154)
关键词 红肠 真空包装 微生物菌相 理化性质 感官评定 red sausage vacuum-packaged microflora physical and chemical property sensory quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1BLIXT Y, BORCH E. Comparison of shelf life of vacuum- packed pork and beeflJ]. Meat Science, 2002, 60(4): 371-378.
  • 2BORNEMAN J, SKROCH P W, O' SULLIVAN K M, et al. Molecular microbial diversity of an agriculture soft in Wisconsin[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1996, 62(6): 1935- 1943.
  • 3BORCH E, KANTMUEMANSH M L, BLIXT Y. Bacterial spoilage of meat and cured meat products[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 1996, 33(1): 103-120.
  • 4HOVDA M B, SIVERTSVIK M, LUNESTAD B T, et al. Characterisation of the dominant bacterial population in modified atmosphere packaged farmed halibut (Hippoglossus hippogtosstts) based on 16S rDNA-DGGE[J]. Food Microbiology, 2007, 24(4): 362-371.
  • 5KESMEN Z, YETIMAN A E, GULLUCE A, et al. Combination of culture-dependent and culture-indipendent molecular methods for the determination of lactic microbiota in sucuk[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2012, 153(3): 428-435.
  • 6ERCOLINI D, FERROCINO I, STORIA A L, et al. Development of spoilage microbiota in beef stored in nisin activated packaging[J]. Food Microbiology, 2010, 27(1): 137- 143.
  • 7GAZZOLA S, FONTANA C, BASSI D, et al. Assessment of tetracycline and erythromycin resistance transfer during sausage fermentation by culture-dependent and-independent methods. Food Microbiology, 2012, 30(2): 348-354.
  • 8VONHOLY A, HOLZAPFEL W. The influence of extrinsic factors on the microbiological spoilage pattern of ground beef[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 1988, 6(4): 269-280.
  • 9汪岩,赵百忠,陈涛.亚麻籽胶在高温火腿肠中应用性能的研究[J].肉类研究,2005,19(8):43-46. 被引量:21
  • 10孙彦雨,周光宏,徐幸莲.冰鲜鸡肉贮藏过程中微生物菌相变化分析[J].食品科学,2011,32(11):146-151. 被引量:27

二级参考文献52

  • 1董庆利,罗欣.熏煮香肠质构的感官评定与机械测定之间的相关分析研究[J].食品科学,2004,25(9):49-55. 被引量:77
  • 2宫曼丽,任南琪,邢德峰.DGGE/TGGE技术及其在微生物分子生态学中的应用[J].微生物学报,2004,44(6):845-848. 被引量:92
  • 3邢德峰,任南琪,宋佳秀,曲敏,徐香玲.不同16SrDNA靶序列对DGGE分析活性污泥群落的影响[J].环境科学,2006,27(7):1424-1428. 被引量:66
  • 4[1]Rodgers S. Preserving non-fermented refrigerated foods with microbial cultures-a review. Trends in FoodScience and Technology, 2001, 12: 276-284.
  • 5[2]Leroi F, Arbey N, Joffraud J J, Chevalier F. Effect of incubation with lactic acid bacteria on extending the shelf-life of vacuum-packed cold smoked salmon.International Journal ofFoodScience and Technology,1996,31:497-504.
  • 6[3]Gilliand S E, Speck M L. Inhibition of psychrotrophic bacteria by Lactobacilli and Pediococci in nonfermented refrigerated foods. Journal of FoodScience, 1975,40:903-904.
  • 7[4]Brashears M M, Reilly S S, Gilliland S E. Antagonistic action of cells Lactobacillus lactis toward Escherichia coli 011:H7 on refrigerated raw chicken meat. Journal of Food Protection, 1998, 61(2):166-170.
  • 8[5]Raccach M, Baker R C, Regenstein J M, Mulnix E J.Potential application of microbial antagonism to extended storage stability of a flesh type food. Journal of Food Science, 1979, 44(1):43-46.
  • 9[6]Vescovo M, Torriani S, Orsi C, Macchiarolo F, Scolari G.Application of antimicrobial-producing lactic acid bacteria to control pathogens in ready-to-use vegetable.Journal of AppliedBacteriology, 1996,81: 113-119.
  • 10BORNEMAN J, SKROCH P W, O'SULLIVAN K M, et al. Molecular microbial diversity of an agriculture soft in Wisconsin[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1996, 62(6): 1935-1943.

共引文献100

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部