期刊文献+

15486例孕中期筛查孕妇妊娠结局随访结果分析 被引量:12

A follow-up analysis of pregnancy outcomes in 15486 cases with prenatal screening
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨产前筛查及产前诊断在临床的应用及意义。方法:应用时间分辨荧光免疫法检测血清学三联指标(AFP+F-β-HCG+uE3)水平,Life-Cycle软件计算风险值;对产前筛查孕妇随访结果进行整理和分析。结果:15 486例孕妇中,血清学筛查高风险860例,筛查阳性率为5.55%;年龄高风险712例。高风险孕妇中575例(36.58%)选择产前诊断,羊水诊断检出21-三体8例、18-三体1例,产前超声诊断检出无脑儿1例。高风险孕妇不良妊娠结局发生率(5.36%)与低风险孕妇(2.02%)相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);多种高风险孕妇不良妊娠结局发生率(26.92%)与仅21-三体或18-三体高风险孕妇(7.74%)相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:产前筛查结果是预测染色体异常胎儿和不良妊娠结局的重要指标,结合产前诊断能有效防止出生缺陷发生;正确有效的随访对产前工作有重要意义。 Objective: To investigate the application and significance of prenatal screening and diagnosis. Methods: The serum samples were measured for the levels of human chorionic gonadotrophin free - β - subunit (F - β - hCG) , alpha - fetoprotein (AFP) and unconjugated estriol ( uE3 ) by using time - resolved fluoroimmunoassay. All the pregnancies who accepted second - trimester combined Down were found. The rate of adverse pregnancy outcomes with high risk was significantly higher than that for the pregnancies of low risk (5.36% vs 2. 02%, P 〈 0. 01 ) and multiple high risk was significantly higher than the pregnancies with high risk of DS or ES (7.74% vs 26. 92%, P 〈 0. 01 ) . Conclusion: Prenatal screening is an important indicator that forecasts chromosomal abnormalities fetus or adverse pregnancy outcomes, and an important tool combined with diagnosis to prevent the birth defect happened effectively. Only correct and effective follow - up can reflect and evaluate objectively the quality of screening.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第3期361-364,共4页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 吉林省发改委产业技术研究与开发项目〔2011007-12〕
关键词 产前筛查 产前诊断 随访 妊娠结局 Prenatal screening Prenatal diagnosis Follow- up analysis Pregnancy outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献10

共引文献23

同被引文献93

  • 1王丹,刘丽,宋朝晖,董佳.3657例孕中期唐氏筛查及产前诊断的临床价值分析[J].中国产前诊断杂志(电子版),2010,2(3):17-20. 被引量:17
  • 2王树玉,兰永连,吕巍,王昕,贾婵维.孕妇年龄、孕周、体重、吸烟、产次对孕妇甲胎蛋白和β-绒毛膜促性腺激素的影响[J].北京医学,2006,28(1):11-14. 被引量:15
  • 3焦红燕,章小维,时春艳.孕中期血清标志物在产前筛查和妊娠结局预测中的意义[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(12):62-64. 被引量:13
  • 4谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].第8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:258-264.
  • 5Spencer K. Second-trimester prenatal screening for Down syndrome and the relationship of maternal serum biochemical markers to pregnancy complications with adverse outcome [J]. Prenat Diagn,2000,20 (8):652-656.
  • 6Karsidag AY, Buyukbayrak EE, Kars B, et al. The relationship between unexplained elevated Serum markers in triple test, uterine artery Doppler measurements and adverse pregnancy outcome[J].J PakMed Assoc,2010,60 (3) :181-186.
  • 7Gagnon A, Wilson RD, Audibert F, et ai. Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analyzes[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2008, 30 (10) :918-949.
  • 8Bas-Budecka E, Perenc M, Sieroszewski P.Abnormal second trimester screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome[J].Ginekol Pol, 2007, 78 (11) :877-880.
  • 9Huang T, Hoffman B, Meschino W, et al. Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes by combinations of first and second trimester biochemistry markers used in the routine prenatal screening of Down syndrome[J].Prenat Diagn, 2010, 30 ( 5 ) :471-477.
  • 10Chapman S J, Brumfield CG, Wenstrom KD, et al. Pregnancy outcomes following false positive multiple markers screening tests[J]. Am J Perinatol, 1997,14 (8) :475-478.

引证文献12

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部