期刊文献+

菊花毛刺的形态及显微结构 被引量:2

Morphology and microstructure of chrysanthemum burr
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以菊花品种‘白毛刺’为供试材料,利用跟踪拍照和石蜡切片技术对其毛刺发育过程中的形态及显微结构进行观察。结果表明:毛刺产生在菊花花芽分化时期,主要产生在小花的上部;毛刺由小花表皮单个细胞脱分化形成,由1个球形的顶部和1个不断伸长的基部组成;发育到一定阶段时,毛刺内部的细胞开始凋亡,导致毛刺中空。 The morphology and microstructure of chrysanthemum burr during the development process were observed by using tracking photos and paraffin section. The results indicated that the burr was generated at the stage of flower bud differentiation stage and mainly located on the apical part of the floret. Dedifferentiated from the floret epidermal single cell, the burr consisted of a global top and a constantly elongating base: By developing to a certain stage, the burr became hollow because of the apoptotic inner cells. These results provided the morphological fundaments for further research on the formation and development of chrysanthemum burr.
出处 《南京农业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期43-46,共4页 Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University
基金 江苏省科技支撑计划项目(BE2011325 BE2012350) 国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200903020) 江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目[CX(12)2020] 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-10-0492) 国家自然科学基金项目(31272196)
关键词 菊花 毛刺 石蜡切片 形态 显微结构 chrysanthemum burr paraffin section morphology microstructure
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

共引文献137

同被引文献28

  • 1王刚,沈永红,王俊芳,王汝贤.南方根结线虫侵染不同抗性烟草品种的组织病理学观察[J].河南农业科学,2006,35(2):61-63. 被引量:8
  • 2王新荣,纪春艳,朱孝伟,黄汉坚,程曦,廖金铃.根结线虫调控其寄主巨型细胞信号研究进展[J].广东农业科学,2006,33(5):113-116. 被引量:3
  • 3茆振川,谢丙炎,杨之为,杨宇红,冯兰香.根结线虫与植物的分子互作[J].园艺学报,2006,33(4):901-907. 被引量:6
  • 4苏印泉,彭锋,黎斌,孙润仓,中泽庆久.桦树松萝的石蜡切片方法改良及形态学研究[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(5):859-863. 被引量:12
  • 5Bird D M,Kaloshian I. Are roots special?Nematodes have their say[J] . Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology,2003,62:115-123.
  • 6Steel A F. Morphological changes in roots of sugarbeet and tomato infected with Heterodera schachtii Schmidt 1871[J] . Journal of the ASSBT,1971,16(7):561-567.
  • 7Ibrahimi I K A,Massouo S I. Development and pathogenesis of a root-knot nematode,Meloidogyne javanica[J] . Proceedings of the Helminthological Society,1974,41(1):68-72.
  • 8Sayed M,Khan A,Khatoon N,et al. Histopathology of mango roots infected by root-knot nematode[J] . Pakistan Journal of Nematol,2010,28(2):335-340.
  • 9Walters S A,Wehner T C,Daykin M E,et al. Penetration rates of root knot nematodes into Cucumis sativus and C.metuliferus roots and subsequent histological changes[J] . Nematropica,2006,36(2):231-242.
  • 10Vovlas N, Rapoport H F,Jim6nez Daz R M, et al. Differences in feeding sites induced by root-knot nematodes,Meloidogyne spp., in chickpea [ J ]. Phytopathology, 2005,95 (4) : 368- 375.

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部