期刊文献+

外国直接投资、国有企业与中国保护政策的内生性

A Political Economy Analysis of Trade and Foreign Direct Investment of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以Grossman and Helpman(1994)的保护待售模型和Grossman and Helpman(1996)带有外国直接投资的扩展模型为基础,运用1993-2000年省际面板数据,使用最小二乘法和工具变量的估计方法,以及关键变量的多种计算口径估算了中国政府的目标函数。本文认为,政府对国有企业保护政策的内生性过程,是对外国直接投资所带来的收益与国有企业因为竞争加剧所带来的损失所进行的权衡。经验估计结果表明,在政府目标函数中,国有企业产出所占的比重是消费者福利所占比重的6倍。显示在国有企业面临外资企业竞争时,政府对国有企业的保护,一定程度上消减了消费者福利。 Based on the endogenous trade model of Grossman and Helpman (1994), we extended it to a model with FDI. We view the political process in China as trading off between the social benefit brought by FDI and trade and the loss of state-owned enterprises due to increased competition incurred by foreign direct investment and trade. We use province panel data over the years 1993-2000 to get government objective function, and find the weight put on state-owned enterprises are 6 times that of the customer welfare.
出处 《亚太经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期108-114,共7页 Asia-Pacific Economic Review
关键词 中国 外国直接投资 保护待售模型 China, Foreign Direct Investment, Political Economy, Protection for Sale
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1贺大兴,姚洋.社会平等、中性政府与中国经济增长[J].经济研究,2011,46(1):4-17. 被引量:124
  • 2孔庆峰,朱俊丽.中国贸易政策的政治经济学分析——基于2002-2007年FDI和对外贸易的面板数据[J].山东社会科学,2011(1):109-112. 被引量:1
  • 3盛斌.中国工业贸易保护结构政治经济学的实证分析[J].经济学(季刊),2002,1(3):603-624. 被引量:47
  • 4Claro S. Why does China Protect its Labour--Inten- sive Industries More? [J] . Economics of Transition. 2006, 14 (2) .. 289-319.
  • 5Grossman G M, Helpman E. Protection for Sale [J] American Economic Review. 1994, 84 (4): 833-850.
  • 6Branstetter L, Lardy N. Chings Embrace of Globaliza- tion. NBER Working Paper. No. 12373. 2006 .
  • 7Grossman G H E. Foreign Investment with Endoge- nous Protection[M]. The Poiltical Economy of Trade Policy: Papers in Honour of Jagdish Bhagwati, Feenstra R C G G, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996, 199-224.
  • 8Branstetter L G, Feenstra R C. Trade and Foreign Di- rect Investment in China: a Political Economy Approach [J] . Journal of International Economics. 2002, 58 (2): 335-358.
  • 9Grossman G, Helpman E. Interest Groups and Trade Policy [M] . Princeton University Press, 2002.
  • 10Grossman G M, Helpman E. Trade Wars and Trade Talks [J] . Journal of Political Economy. 1995, 103 (4) : 675 -708.

二级参考文献42

  • 1奥尔森.《国家的兴衰》,上海人民出版社,2007.
  • 2Mayer, Wolfgang. Endogenous tariff formation [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1984, 74 : 970 - 985.
  • 3Magee, Stephen P. ; Brock, William A. and Young, Leslie. Black hole tariffs and endogenous policy theory: Political economy in general equilibrium [ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  • 4Hillman, Arye and Ursprung, Heinrich W. Multinational firms, political competition, and international trade policy [ J ]. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 1993,34 : 347 - 363.
  • 5Goldberg, Pinelopi and Giovanni Maggi. Protection for sale: an empirical investigation[ J]. American Economic Review, 1999, 89 (5) :1155.
  • 6Grether, Jean -Marie, Jaime de Melo and Marcelo Olarrega. Who determine Mexican trade policy?. Policy Research Working Paper, 2187.
  • 7Branstetter, L. G. , and Feenstra, R. C. Trade and foreign direct investment in China: a political economy approach[ J]. Journal of International Economics, 2002, 58 (2):335-358.
  • 8Perkins, D. , 2004, " China' s Economic Development in an International Perspective" , paper presented in the conference " China' s Economic Reform and Growth", China Center for Economic Research, Peking University.
  • 9Qian, Y. and G. Roland, 1998, "Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint", American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 5, pp. 1143--1162.
  • 10Qian, Y. and B. Weingast, 1997, " Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives", Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 83--92.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部