期刊文献+

不同镇痛方式对食管癌手术后护理的影响 被引量:1

The influence of different analgesic methods on postoperative care of esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较硬膜外自控镇痛(PCEA)和静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)对缓解胸部手术患者术后疼痛的影响。方法:将86例食管癌手术患者随机分为E组(n=43)和I组(n=43),分别使用PCEA和PCIA镇痛,观察2组镇痛效果。结果:术后5 d内视觉模拟评分、使用辅助药物治疗镇痛的用量、术后拔管时间、ICU住院时间、术后开始走路时间和住院时间,2组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。E组发生肺部并发症3例,I组14例;E组发生吻合口漏2例,I组6例;E组术后发生谵妄2例,I组6例,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:食管癌患者开胸手术术后PCEA优于PCIA,对改善食管癌手术后护理、减少住院时间和促进患者康复有着积极的意义。 Objectlve:To compare the influence of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) on relieving the postoperative pain of patient with thoracic operation. Methods:Eighty-six patients with esophageal surgery were randomly divided into PCEA group( E group ,43 cases) and PCIA group (I group ,43 cases), and treated with PCEA and PCIA analgesia, respectively. Their effects were observed. Results: The differences of the visual analogue scale at 5 d after operation, the dosage of analgesic auxiliary drug, the hospital stays in ICU, the time of postoperative walking and hospital stays between two groups had statistical significance(P 〈0.01 ). The occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications, stomal leak and delirium in group E and group I were 3 cases & 14 cases,2 cases & 6 cases and 2 & 6 cases,respectively,the differences of which had no statistical significance (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions : The effects of PCEA on relieving the postoperative pain of patients with thoracic operation are better than that of PCIA. The PCEA can improve the postoperative care of esophageal cancer, reduce hospital stays and promote the patients rehabilitation.
出处 《蚌埠医学院学报》 CAS 2013年第12期1669-1670,共2页 Journal of Bengbu Medical College
关键词 食管肿瘤 自控镇痛 硬膜外 esophageal neoplasms analgesia patient-controlled epidural
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Morita M,Yoshida R,Ikeda K. Advances in esophageal cancer surgery in Japan:an analysis of 1000 consecutive patients treated at a single institute[J].{H}SURGERY,2008,(04):499-508.
  • 2Schubert D,Dalicho S,Flohr L. Management of postoperative complications following esophagectomy[J].{H}CHIRURG,2012,(08):712-718.
  • 3Dubois MY. New techniques in postoperative analgesia.Including patient-controlled intravenous administration[J].{H}Postgraduate Medicine,1991,(06):143-150.
  • 4Weber T,M(a)tzl J,Rokitansky A. Superior postoperative pain relief with thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair[J].{H}Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,2007,(04):865-870.
  • 5Brown MJ,Kor DJ,Allen MS. Dual-epidural catheter technique and perioperative outcomes after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy[J].{H}Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine,2013,(01):3-8.
  • 6Yoshida N,Watanabe M,Baba Y. Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J].{H}SURGERY TODAY-THE JAPANESE Journal OF SURGERY,2013.
  • 7Markar SR,Smith IA,Karthikesalingam A. The clinical and economic costs of delirium after surgical resection for esophageal malignancy[J].{H}ANNALS OF SURGERY,2013,(01):77-81.

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部