奥运会男子拳击冠、亚军战术实效性研究——以2012年伦敦奥运会为例

Tactical Effectiveness Research on Olympic Boxing Champion and Runner up Athletes——Taking the London 2012 Olympic Games as Example

运用录像观察、数理统计、专家访谈、比较分析等方法,对伦敦奥运会男子拳击决赛冠、亚军运动员不同回合主要得分战术的运用效果进行对比和分析。研究结果显示,1)运动员在比赛中运用主动进攻战术最多,防守反击战术较多,迎击战术最少;3种战术的得分效果有所差异,都具有极为重要得分作用和战术价值;2)运动员在第1回合比赛中运用主动进攻战术次数最多,第2回合次之,第3回合最少;在第1回合比赛中运用防守反击战术次数最少,第2回合次之,第3回合最多;防守反击战术的得分效果强于主动进攻战术;3)所有运动员在第1回合运用迎击战术的次数最多,第2回合其次,第3回合最少;迎击战术在得分、得分率上强于主动进攻战术、防守反击战术;冠军运用迎击战术的次数、得分高于亚军。

By using the video observation, mathematical statistics, expert interviews, comparative analysis and other research methods, this paper makes comparison and analysis on scoring tacti- cal use of the effect of the different rounds of the London 2012 Olympic Games men＇s boxing finals champion and runner up athletes. The results show that 1） athletes using active offen- sive tactics in the competition are more, engaged the tactical least;score the effect of the three kinds of tactical differences, have a very important role in scoring and tactical value; 2） in the first round of the competition, athletes using proactive tactics are most times, the second round, followed by the third round at least;use the least number of defenses in the first round of the competition, followed by the second round, third round;effect of strong defenses of the score in proactive tactics; 3） all the athletes in the first round of the use of the number of times engaged the tactical largest, followed by the second round, third round at least;engaged the tactical score, score rate stronger than proactive tactical defenses ; champion athlete the use of the number of times engaged the tactical score higher than the runner-up.