期刊文献+

基于疏忽的最优投资决策 被引量:1

The Optimal Investment Decision to the Inattentive Behaviour
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究存在获得、吸收和处理信息的成本时代表性消费者的最优消费和投资决策问题,结果显示成本的存在意味着消费者仅选择在特定时间更新其决策,且在两相邻决策日间保持疏忽。这种理性疏忽的行为特征将直接影响投资决策,进而产生有限参与、处置行为和高储蓄率等现象。模型明确了成本、财富水平等因素对于投资者的消费、投资决策的影响途径及程度,为如何针对不同投资群体合理引导其消费、投资行为以及健全资本市场机制、完善多元化金融服务体制提供了具有可操作性的理论依据和政策建议。同时通过比对相关研究结果,侧面论证了中国市场主要以短期疏忽投资者为主,为研究摩擦市场中的资产价格异动及信息时滞下的政策效应提供了新的视角。 Consumption and investment decisions of agents in the presence of costs of acquiring, absorbing and processing information are studied in this paper. As the optimal decision, the agents will choose to ad- just their plans at a pre-set date and keep inattentive between the adjustment. The rational inattentive be- havior will directly affect the investment decision, and makes an interpretation to the limited participation, disposition effect and the high saving rate in the household^s decision-making. It makes clear about the ways and degree of the effect to the investors" decision-making by the factors as costs and wealth etc. , and provides a feasible theoretical basis and policy suggestions to how to guide rational behavior of different in- vestors, improve the capital market mechanism, and perfect the diversified financial service system. At the same time, compared to the related research results, it can be found that investors in the domestic market are mainly being short-term inattentive investors, which provides a new way to study the price movements and the effect of policy under information delay.
作者 冉朝 王源昌
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期29-36,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71163046)
关键词 疏忽 有限关注 投资决策 处置行为 家庭金融 inattentive limited attention investment decision disposition effect household finance
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1AmeriksJ, Zeldes S P. How do household portfolio shares vary with age?[RJ TIAA-CREF Working pa?per, Columbia Business School, 2004.
  • 2Mitchell 0 S, Mottola G R, Utkus S p, et al. The inat?tentive participant: Portfolio trading behavior in 401( k) plans[R]. Working paper, Pension Research Council, 2006.
  • 3Constantinides G M. Capital market equilibrium with transactions costs[J] .Journal of Political Economy, 1986,(94) :842-862.
  • 4吴卫星,汪勇祥,梁衡义.过度自信、有限参与和资产价格泡沫[J].经济研究,2006,41(4):115-127. 被引量:94
  • 5Duffie D, Sun T S. Transactions costs and portfolio choice in a discrete-continuous -tirne setting[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1990,14 (1) : 35- 51.
  • 6Abel A B, EberlyJ C, Panageas S. Optimal inattention to the stock market with information costs and transac?tions costs[R]. NBER Working paper, 2009.
  • 7Alvarez F, Guiso L, Lippi F. Durable consumption and asset management with transaction and observation costs[R]. NBER Working paper, 2010.
  • 8Alvarez F, Lippi F, Paciello L. Optimal price setting with observation and menu costs[RJ. NBER Working paper,2010.
  • 9Allen F, Gale D. Limited market participation and vola?tility of asset prices[] J. The American Economic Re?view, 1994,(84):933-955.
  • 10VissingJorgensen A. Towards an explanation of household portfolio choice heterogeneity: Nonfinancial income and participation cost structures[RJ. NBER Working Paper,2002.

二级参考文献36

  • 1吴卫星,汪勇祥.基于搜寻的有限参与、事件风险与流动性溢价[J].经济研究,2004,39(8):85-93. 被引量:13
  • 2汪勇祥,吴卫星.基于流动性的资产定价模型——中国股市“流动性之谜”的一个理论解释[J].经济学(季刊),2004,3(B10):27-40. 被引量:13
  • 3吴卫星,梁衡义.过度自信、流动性和资产定价*[J].财经问题研究,2005(5):3-8. 被引量:11
  • 4汪昌云,汪勇祥.2004.《流动性溢价,抑或投资者心态?—来自中国股市异常交易量与预期收益关系的证据》,工作论文.
  • 5Allen, F. and D. Gale, 1994, " Limited Market Participation and Volatility of Asset Prices." American Economic Review, September 84.
  • 6Alpert, Marc and Raiffa, Howard, 1982, "A Progress Report on the Training of Probability Assessors", in Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky, eds. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  • 7Barber, Brad M. and Odean,Terrance, 2001, "Boys will be boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment", The Quarterly Journal of Economics , February, PP261-292.
  • 8Benos, Alexandros V., 1998, "Aggressiveness and Survival of Overconfident Traders." Journal of Financial Markets, October, 1(3-4).
  • 9Bollerslev, Tim, Ray Yeutien Chou and Kenneth Kroner, 1992, " ARCH Modeling in Finance: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence," Journal of Econometrics, vol. 52, PP5-59.
  • 10Cao, Henry, Tan Wang and Harold H. Zhang, 2005, "Model Uncertainty, Limited Market Participation and Asset Prices", The Review of Financial Studies, 18: PP1219-1251.

共引文献93

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部