期刊文献+

论非法证据排除规则的完善路向——由新《刑事诉讼法》引发的思考 被引量:1

On Perfection Direction of Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence:Reflection on New Criminal Procedure Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2012年修改后的《刑事诉讼法》所明确确立的非法证据排除规则在规范侦查机关的取证行为、保障基本人权、实现司法公正、维护司法形象等方面具有重要意义。因此,其在新《刑事诉讼法》中的确立在我国刑事诉讼发展历程中具有重要里程碑意义。然而,新《刑事诉讼法》关于非法证据排除规则的法条本身及长久以来的司法传统和现实的司法环境使非法证据排除规则要发挥出其应有的功效还任重道远。因此,进一步完善法律的相关规定,改变一些落后的司法传统,营造依法取证、主动排除非法证据的司法环境是使非法证据排除规则应有功效得到最好发挥的关键所在。 The exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence, which is clearly stated in the revised Criminal Procedure Law in 2012, is of great significance in regulating evidence-obtaining of investigative organization, guaranteeing the fundamental human rights, implementing justice and maintaining the judicial image; therefore, it is an important milestone in the development of criminal procedure. However, the articles of the rule, judicial tradition for years and realistic judicial environment make it unable to give the rule into full play. Accordingly, it is crucial to bring the rule into full play to further improve the relevant regulations, to update some outdated judicial tradition and to build the environment of obtaining evidence legally and excluding illegal evidence initiativelv.
作者 陈志兴
出处 《福建行政学院学报》 2013年第6期63-68,共6页 Journal of Fujian Administration Institute
关键词 非法证据排除规则 保障人权 程序正义 《刑事诉讼法》 Exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence Assurance of human rights Procedural justice Criminal procedure law
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1卞建林,杨宇冠.非法证据排除规则实证研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2012.
  • 2陈瑞华,黄永,褚福民.法律程序改革的突破与限度-2012年刑事诉讼法修改评述[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2012:76.
  • 3季卫东.程序比较论[J].比较法研究,1993,7(1):1-46. 被引量:734
  • 4樊崇义,兰跃军,潘少华.刑事证据制度发展与适用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2012:30.

二级参考文献49

  • 1FToschi.
  • 2John Rawls.A Theory of Justice,1971.
  • 3Lawrence M Friedman.A History of American Law,1985.
  • 4David E Aptei.The Politics of Modernization,1985.
  • 5MKucharska et al.
  • 6Frank K.Upham.Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan,1987.
  • 7Joseph A Schumpeter.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy,1976.
  • 8Morton J Horwitz.The transformation of American law,1977.
  • 9Charles A Miller.The Forest of Due Process of Law:The American Constitution TraditionDue Process(NOMOS XVIII),1977.
  • 10Cover, R.M,&Fiss, O.M,&. Resnik,J.Procedure,1988.

共引文献745

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部