执行异议之诉与异议前置审查程序的衔接互动

Linked Interaction Between Dissent Action of Execution and Pre-litigation Review Procedure

执行程序在价值取向上注重效率,故执行异议前置审查程序中判断执行标的实体权属遵循《物权法》的物权公示原则。与之相衔接,执行异议之诉则立足实质正义,力求探知真实的权利状态,按照《执行规定》第17条公正判断案外人是否具备"足以排除强制执行的实体权利",共同共有、占有、用益物权、担保物权和债权请求权等在一定条件下均可能成为"足以排除强制执行的实体权利"。《物权法》与《执行规定》第17条是案外人执行异议机制不同阶段的实体法依据,两者并无矛盾冲突。

The executive procedure pays attention to efficiency in value, so how to judge the substantive ownership of executable objects shall follow principles of public summons stipulated by Property Law. Linked up with it, dissent action of execution lies in justice in order to ascertain the real state of rights and to judge if outsiders have substantive rights excluded compulsory execution in accordance with Article 17 in Executive Provisions. Co- ownership, occupancy, usufructs, security interests and rights of obligatory claim may become such entity rights under certain conditions. Property Law and Article 17 in Executive Provisions is the base of the substantive law for outsiders to execute dissent actions at different stages. There is no contradictory conflict between them.