期刊文献+

多尺寸人工全膝关节系统的临床应用分析及随访结果 被引量:2

Clinical application analysis and follow-up results of multi-size total knee prosthesis system
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨应用多尺寸膝关节假体系统的临床应用优势及早期随访结果.方法 回顾性分析自2010年12月至2012年12月78例应用Vanguard膝关节系统进行人工全膝表面关节置换患者.术中记录应用股骨假体型号,术后定期门诊随访,拍摄X线片,应用KSS评分和WOMAC评分评估手术效果.结果 78例患者平均随访15.8个月.术前KSS评分(34.68±8.07)分,WOMAC评分(62.40±3.74)分,术后末次随访KSS评分(84.99±3.64)分,WOMAC评分(25.86±3.31)分.术前患者膝关节平均屈曲度(95.83°±13.83°),术后末次随访时患者膝关节平均屈曲度(122.63°±9.93°).患者术后膝关节功能明显改善,评分具有统计学差异(P〈0.01).常用股骨假体型号在55~70 mm之间,并且70%以上集中在60~65 mm.结论 Vanguard膝关节假体能满足不同个体的需求,适应性强,有利于伸屈间隙的平衡,假体覆盖好,早期随访临床效果满意. Objective To discuss the benefits of multi-size totle knee prosthesis system and the early follow-up results. Methods 78 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with Vanguard complete knee system from December 2010 to December 2012. The femoral prosthesis size was recorded. HSS and WOMAC were used to evaluate the overall outcomes in the follow-up. Results 78 patients were followed up for 15.8 months in average. The preoperative KSS score was ( 34. 68 ± 8.07 ) , and the WOMAC score was (62.40 ± 3.74). At the last follow-up, the postoperative KSS score was ( 84.99 ± 3.64) and the WOMAC score was (25.86 ± 3.31 ). The average knee flexion degree was (95.83° ± 13.83°) preoperation. At the last follow-up, the average knee flexion degree was (122. 63° ± 9.93°). The postoperative knee function improved significantly. The scores had statistically significant difference. The common femoral prosthesis size was 55 - 70 mm, and the size of more than 70% prostheses was between 60 -65 mm. Conclusion The Vanguard complete knee system can meet the needs of different individuals, and it is good for the balance of the flexion and extension gap. The early follow-up clinical outcomes are satisfactory.
出处 《中华关节外科杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2013年第6期25-28,共4页 Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 关节成形术 置换 随访研究 治疗结果 Arthroplasty, replacement, knee Follow-up studies Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Mahoney OM,Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty:risk factors and clinical consequences[J].{H}Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,2010.1115-1121.
  • 2Kim YH,Choi Y,Kim JS. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis:a prospective,randomized,short-term outcome study[J].{H}Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,2010.1911-1920.
  • 3Zalzal P,Backstein D,Gross AE. Notching of the anterior femoral cortex during total knee arthroplasty characteristics that increase local stresses[J].{H}Journal of Arthroplasty,2006.737-743.
  • 4Ghosh KM,Merican AM,Iranpour F. The effect of overstuffing the patellofemoral joint on the extensor retinaculum of the knee[J].{H}Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy,2009.1211-1216.
  • 5Siu D,Rudan J,Wevers HW. .Femoral articular shape and geometry.A three-dimensional computerized analysis of the knee[J].{H}Journal of Arthroplasty,1996.166-173.
  • 6Godest AC,Beaugonin M,Haug E,el al. Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis[J].{H}Journal of Biomechanics,2002.267-275.
  • 7Yue B,Varadarajan KM,Ai S. Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women[J].{H}Journal of Arthroplasty,2011.124-130.
  • 8罗吉伟,覃承诃,胡岩君,金丹,余斌.股骨远端三维截骨测量及假体形态的性别差异分析[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2009,3(3):42-44. 被引量:3
  • 9张健,董纪元,付忠田.国人膝关节尺寸与5种人工膝关节假体尺寸的对照[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2009,13(4):635-638. 被引量:21
  • 10Huang CH,Cheng CK,Liau JJ. Morphometrical comparison between the resected surfaces in osteoarthritic knees and porous-coated anatomic knee prosthesis[J].J Muscul Res,2000.39-46.

二级参考文献29

  • 1周飞虎,王岩,周勇刚.国人正常股骨远端三维模型及骨形态测量研究[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(6):62-63. 被引量:23
  • 2Hitt K, Shurman JR 2nd, Greene K, et al.Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 4:115-122.
  • 3Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, et al.Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29(8): 1039-1049.
  • 4Erkman M J, Walker PS. A study of knee geometry applied to the design of condylar prostheses. Biomed Eng. 1974;9(1):14-17.
  • 5Walker PS. Design of total knee arthroplasty. In : Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, et al ,eds. Surgery of the knee. 2nd ed. New York:Churchill Livingstone.1993:730.
  • 6Cheng CK, Lung CY, Lee YM, et al.A new approach of designing the tibial baseplate of total knee prostheses. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14(2):112-117.
  • 7Hoaglund FT, Low WD. Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1980;(152):10-16.
  • 8Miyake T. Studies on the sizes and shape of Japanese knee and their applications to the design of the knee prosthesis. J Jap Orthop Asso. 1978;52:865.
  • 9Siu D, Rudan J, Wevers HW, et al.Femoral articular shape and geometry. A three-dimensional computerized analysis of the knee. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11 (2):166-173.
  • 10Vaidya SV, Ranawat CS, Aroojis A, et al.Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(1 ):79-85.

共引文献22

同被引文献42

  • 1周阳,杨土保,李映兰,余婕,曾必云.基于互联网平台的髋关节置换患者健康教育实证分析[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2015,40(3):298-302. 被引量:22
  • 2邱贵兴,翁习生,赵栋,林进,金今,赵宏,赵庆.活动和固定衬垫型假体在全膝关节表面置换术中的早期临床比较研究[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(24):1678-1682. 被引量:6
  • 3MOSKAL J T, CAPPS S G. Rottating-platfirm TKA no differnt from fixed-bearing TKA regding survivorship or perfrmance: a meta-analysis[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(7): 2185-2193.
  • 4PETERS C L, MULKEY P, ER1CKSON J, et al. Comparison of Iotal knee arthroplasty with highly congTuent anterior-stabilized bearings versus a crueiate-retaining design[J]. Clin Orlhop Re/at Res, 2014, 472(1): 175-180.
  • 5BUECHEL F F S R. Leng-term follow-up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, 404: 40- 50.
  • 6RANAWAT A S. ROSSI R, I,ORETI I, et al.Camlparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-piatfrm Iolal knee allhro- plasly in tile same palient[J]. J Arlhroplasty, 2004, 19(1): 35-39.
  • 7HASEGAWA M, SUDO A, UCHID A. Staged bilateral too-bile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty in the same patients:a prospective comparison of a posterior-stabilized prosthesis[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2009, 17(3): 237-243.
  • 8HUANG C H, LIAU J J, CHENG C K. Fixed or mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2007, 2(1): 1-8.
  • 9MUNOZ A S, HERRERO F A, LOZANO R L, et al. Comparison of mobile-and fixed-bearing cemented total knee arthroplasty[J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2008, 74(6): 801-808.
  • 10CHAUDHARY R, BEAUPRE LA, JOHNSTON DW. Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of poster/or cruci- ate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prosthe- ses: a randomized clinical trial [J]. J Bone joint Surg Am, 2008, 90(12): 2579-2586.

引证文献2

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部