奇文共欣赏 疑义相与析——也答马成生先生

Enjoying Queer Writing together,Analyzing Doubts getting along——Also Answering to Mr. Ma Chengsheng

马成生先生的辩文学术失范,玩弄文字游戏,堪称奇文,主要表现为:当出注不出注,篡改对方原话,歪曲论题论点,避而不答硬伤和软肋,将小说描写与现实对号入座,形而上学的方法论。答文针对"双施"(施彦端与施耐庵)难以合一、《水浒传》的"内证"、施耐庵生卒年及进士、"苏北大丰那个""施彦端"等问题,引证辨析,认为《水浒传》作者施耐庵与施彦端是同一个人,与中宣部批准的"中华文明历史题材美术创作工程"2012年5月25日公布的第131项选题"四大名著"中关于施耐庵的简介是一致的。

Mr. Ma Chengsheng＇ s discussing article, is academic dishonesty, playing word games, can be said to be a queer writing, mainly showes as： where need taking the note is not a note, tampering with the other words, distorting thesis and argument, taking the fifth bruising and weaknesses, sitting fiction and reality in the right seats, belonging to metaphysical methodology. This paper aiming at the questions of double Shi （Shi Naian and Shi Yanduan） ＇ s difficulty to unity, ＂the inner proof＂ of Water Margin, Shi Naian＇ s dates of birth and death and scholar, and that ＂Shi Yanduan in northern Jiangsu＂, citing and analyzing, thinks that Shi Naian, the au- thor of Water Margin and Shi Yanduan are the same person, and this is accordant with the introduction of Shi Naian in the 131th item of topic selection in the Four Great Classical Novels of the Chinese Civilization History Subject Art Creation Project which approved by the Central Propoganda Department, released on May 25, 2012.