期刊文献+

索利那新联合坦索罗辛治疗双J管相关症状疗效观察 被引量:1

Effects of solifenacin and tamsulosin for the treatment of double-J stent related symptoms
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨索利那新联合坦索罗辛对改善双J管相关症状的疗效.方法 79例输尿管镜碎石术后留置双J管患者随机分为治疗组和对照组.对照组常规治疗,治疗组在常规治疗基础上每天加用索利那新5mg及坦索罗辛0.2mg共4周.4周后拔除双J管,同时完成国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、视觉模拟评分(VAS).结果 全部患者完成研究,无严重并发症发生.对照组中IPSS总分、IPSS刺激评分、IPSS储尿评分、QOL评分、VAS评分分别为(13.56±5.10)、(7.23±3.50)、(6.33±2.55)、(2.75±1.26)、(2.88±1.64),治疗组为(7.26±3.20)、(4.15±2.16)、(3.11±2.07)、(1.40±1.23)、(2.03±1.35),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 索利那新联合坦索罗辛能有效改善患者因留置双J管引起的相关症状,提高生活质量. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of solifenacin and tamsulosin in improving double-J stent related urinary tract symptoms.Methods A total of 79 patients with double-J stent placement following ureteroscopic lithotripsy were randomized into two groups.The treated group received 5 mg solifenacin and 0.2 mg tamsulosin once daily for 4 weeks,and the control group received routine treatment.All patients were asked to complete the Intemational Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS),quanlity of life (QOL) and visual analogue scale (VAS) 4 weeks post -operatively when the double-J stent was removed.Results All patients finished the studies.The total IPSS score,irritative IPSS score,obstructive IPSS score,Qol and VAS score were all significantly different between the two groups(P <0.05).Total IPSS score:(13.56 ±5.10) vs(7.26 ±3.20) ; irritative IPSS score:(7.23 ±3.50)vs (4.15 ± 2.16) ; obstructive IPSS score:(6.33 ± 2.55) vs (3.11 ± 2.07) ; QOL:(2.75 ± 1.26) vs (1.40 ± 1.23) ; VAS score:(2.88 ± 1.64) vs (2.03 ± 1.35).Conclusions Administration of solifenacin and tamsulosin for patients with an interal double-J stent can relieve stent-related symptoms and improve quality of life.
出处 《国际泌尿系统杂志》 2014年第1期55-57,共3页 International Journal of Urology and Nephrology
关键词 碎石术 生活质量 Lithotripsy Quality of Life
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Lim KT,Kim YT,Lee TY. Effects of tamsulosin,solifenacin,and combination therapy for the treatment of ureteral stent related discomforts[J].Korean J Urol,2011,(07):485-488.
  • 2Wang C J,Huang SW,Chang CH. Effects of tamsulosin on lower urinary tract symptoms due to double-J stent:a prospective study[J].{H}UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS,2009,(01):66-69.
  • 3Ho CH,Tai HC,Chang HC. Predictive factors for ureteral double-J-stent-related symptoms:a prospective,multivariate analysis[J].{H}Journal of the Formosan Medical Association,2010,(11):848-856.
  • 4Joshi HB,Stainthorpe A,MacDonagh RP. Indwelling ureteral stents:evaluation of symptoms,quality of life and utility[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,2003,(03):1065-1069.
  • 5邱智,孙玉成,朱丽珍,王升晗,陈小松,崔波.输尿管留置双J管患者生活质量的初步调查[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2010,31(12):828-830. 被引量:43
  • 6Gupta M,Patel T,Xavier K. Prospective randomized evaluation of periureteral botulinum toxin type A injection for ureteral stent pain reduction[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,2010,(02):598-602.
  • 7Oreskovi S,But I,Banovi M. The efficacy and safety of solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder syndrome[J].{H}Collegium Antropologicum,2012,(01):243-248.
  • 8Luo D,Liu L,Han P. Solifenacin for overactive bladder:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].{H}International Urogynecology Journal,2012,(08):983-991.
  • 9Navanimitkul N,Lojanapiwat B. Efficacy of tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day in relieving double-J stent-related symptoms:a randomized controlled study[J].{H}Journal of International Medical Research,2010,(04):1436-1441.
  • 10Wang C J,Huang SW,Chang CH. Effects of specific alpha-1 A/ 1D blocker on lower urinary tract symptoms due to double-J stent:a prospectively randomized study[J].{H}UROLOGICAL RESEARCH,2009,(03):147-152.

二级参考文献4

  • 1Chew BH,Knudsen BE,Denstedt JD.The use of stents in contemporary urology.Curr Opin Urol,2004,14:111-115.
  • 2Vega Vega A,Garcia Alonso D,Garc(i)a Alonso CJ.Symptoms assessment and quality of life in patients with double pig tail ureteral stents.Actas Urol Esp,2007,31:738-742.
  • 3Joshi HB,Stainthorpe A,MacDonagh RP,et al.Indwelling ureteral stents:evaluation of symptoms,quality of life and utility.J Urol,2003,169:1065-1069.
  • 4Dunn MD,Portis AJ,Kahn SA,et al.Clinical effectiveness of new stent design:randomized single blind comparison of tail and double pig-tails stents.J Endourol,2000,14:195-202.

共引文献42

同被引文献13

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部