期刊文献+

论美国不可争议条款规制投保欺诈的制度构成及其正当性 被引量:2

On the Incontestable Clause System in America:Origin and Just Base
原文传递
导出
摘要 不可争议条款制度约束保险公司撤销保险合同或主张保险合同无效的权利,强化了保险消费者的保险合同期待权。该制度是否豁免投保欺诈是其适用中最大的争议,本文重点围绕美国立法例,论述不可争议条款豁免投保欺诈的表现形式、制度缘起、正当性依据及其质疑,探究该制度全貌,以期为完善我国《保险法》中的不可争议条款制度提供理性思考依据。 Incontestable clause constraints the right of insurance companies to revoke the insurance contract, and strengthen the protection of insurance consumers rights to expect the insurance contract coverage. The most controversy about the incontestable clause system is whether or not to exempt insur- ance fraud in the process of application by the insured. The article focuses on the U.S. guiding cases and describes the complete picture of the system by discussing the manifestations of the incontestable clause, origin of the system, and just base with challenge so as to provide rational thinking basis on im- proving the provisions of Article 16 of Insurance Law of P. R. C.
出处 《比较法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期112-124,共13页 Journal of Comparative Law
基金 教育部人文社科研究基金规划项目"保险消费者保护制度及实施研究"(项目号:13YJA820060)课题成果之一 2012年国家留学基金委"中青年骨干教师出国研修项目"(项目号:201206645006)的资助
关键词 如实告知 投保欺诈 不可争议条款 objective disclosure by the insured fraud in application incontestable clause
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Security Mut. Life lns. Co. of New York v. Herpaul, 36A. D. 3d449 (2007).
  • 2Edwin W. Patterson, Warranties in Insurance Law, 34 Columbia L. Rew. 595, 601 -602 (Apr. 1934).
  • 3Plotner v. Northwestern Nat! Life Ins. Co. , 48 N.D. 295, 183 N.W. 1000, 1003 ( 1921 ).
  • 4Insurance. Effect of Incontestability Clause Where the Insured Died within the Named Period of Contest, 26 Columbia L. Rew. 899, 899 - 900 (Nov. 1926).
  • 5Robert R. Googins, Fraud and the Incontestable Clause: A Modest Proposal for Change, 2 Conn. Ins. L.J. 51, 68 (1996).
  • 6Maxwell v. Cumberland Life Ins. Co. , 113 Idaho 808, 811 , 748 P. 2d 392, 395 -397 (1987).
  • 7Thomas Benjamin Gay, The Incontestable Life Insurance Policy. May It Ever Be Contested? 17 The Virginia L. Reg. 1, I ( May 1911 ).
  • 8J. S. , Insurance: Incontestability Clauses: What Will Amount to a Contest, 25 Michigan L. Rew. 532, 532 -534 (Mar. 1927).
  • 9Edward E. Graves, McGill's Life Insurance 871 (3d ed. , The American College/Bryn Mawr 2000).
  • 10Kansas Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Whitehead, 123 Ky. 21, 26, 93 S.W. 609, 610 (1906).

二级参考文献5

  • 1David G. Newkirk. An economic analysis of the first manifest doctrine:paul revere life insurance CO. V. HAAS,644 A. 2D 1098 ( N. J. 1994) [ J]. Nebraska Law Review, 1997,76:832.
  • 2Edward E. Graves. McGill' s Life Insurance[ M]. 3rd, Pennsylvania:The American College/Bryn Mawr, 2000 : 871.
  • 3Eric K. Fosaaen. Aids and the incontestability clause[ J]. North Dakota Law Review 1990,66:294.
  • 4H. M. Horne and D. B. Mansfield. The Life Insurance Contract [ M ]. New York : Life Office Management Asso- ciation, 1948 : 181.
  • 5Robert R. Googins. Fraud and the incontestable clause:a modest proposal for change [ J ]. Connecticut Insur- ance Law Journal, 1996,2 : 87.

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部