期刊文献+

一种5级儿科急诊分诊有效性及可靠性分析 被引量:17

Efficacy and reliability of a five-level pediatric emergency triage system
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的制定急诊儿科分诊标准并检验该标准在判断急诊儿科患者就诊时病情严重程度分类上的有效性及可靠性。方法按照美国心脏协会、美国儿科学会《儿科高级生命支持》的评估方法,结合我院实际情况制定儿科急诊分诊标准;收集应用该标准前后各1年时间内的分诊数据,统计分析所得资料。结果在应用该分诊标准前后,急诊患儿家属对就诊次序的平均满意度分别为(81.28±3.97)%及(94.13±4.62)%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);候诊期间病情加重的病例数分别占1.83%(628/34275)及0.04%(16/36187),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);急诊入院患儿平均候诊时间分别为(12.71±2.32)min及(3.34±1.95)min,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);急诊患儿病情严重程度误判率分别为3.78%(1296/34275)及0.57%(205/36187),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论5级分诊标准适合儿科急诊分诊工作,客观简便,能迅速分检急诊儿科的危重病例,有利于急诊分诊效果的持续改进,合理使用急诊医疗资源,缓解诊室拥挤。 Objective To formulate a five-level pediatric emergency triage standard and evaluate the efficacy and reliability of it in determining severity of emergency pediatric patients. Methods According to the assessment methods in Pediatric Advanced Life Support recommended by American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics, we formulated a five-level pediatric emergency triage standard based on the situation of our hospital and analyzed the data one year before and after the application of it. Results Before and after the application of the triage standard, the average satisfaction rate of emergency patients were ( 81.28 ± 3.97 ) % and (94. 13 ± 4. 62) %, and there was significant difference ( P 〈 0.01 ) ; the proportion of whom became worse during waiting time were 1.83 % (628/34 275 ) and 0.04% (16/36 187 ), and there was significant difference (P 〈0. 01 ) ;the average waiting time of emergency admission patients were (12. 71 ± 2. 32) rain and (3.34 ± 1.95 ) rain, and there was significant difference ( P 〈 0.01 ) ; the misjudgment rate of severity were 3.78% ( 1 296/34 275 ) and 0. 57% ( 205/36 187 ), and there was significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The five-level triage standard is objective, easy to master, and suitable for pediatric triage. It can quickly sort out critical cases from emergency pediatric patients, which can improve the effectiveness of emergency service, make use of medical resources rationally and somewhat solve the problem of overcrowding.
出处 《中国小儿急救医学》 CAS 2014年第1期2-5,共4页 Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine
基金 四川省卫生厅科学研究项目(080307)
关键词 儿科 急诊 分诊 分级 有效性 可靠性 Pediatrics Emergency Triage Classify Efficacy Reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Oredsson S,Jonsson H,Rognes J. A systematic review of triage-related interventions to improve patient flow in emergency departments[J].Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med,2011.43.
  • 2Institute of Medicine. IOM report:the future of emergency care in the United States health system[J].{H}ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE,2006,(10):1081-1085.
  • 3Thompson T,Stanford K,Dick R. Triage assessment in pediatric emergency departments:a national survey[J].{H}Pediatric Emergency Care,2010,(8):544-548.
  • 4van Veen M,Moll HA. Reliability and validity of triage systems in paediatric emergency care[J].Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med,2009.38.
  • 5Chisholm CD,Collison EK,Nelson DR. Emergency department workplace interruptions:are emergency physicians "interrupt-driven" and " multitasking "[J].{H}ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE,2000,(11):1239-1243.
  • 6Pines JM,Garson C,Baxt WG. ED crowding is associated with variable perceptions of care compromise[J].{H}ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE,2007,(12):1176-1181.
  • 7Christ M,Grossmann F,Winter D. Modern triage in the emergency department[J].Dtsch Arztebl Int,2010,(50):892-898.
  • 8Farrokhnia N,G(o)ransson KE. Swedish emergency department triage and interventions for improved patient flows:a national update[J].Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med,2011.72.
  • 9许子彬,陆燕华,吴浩.教学医院急诊日夜就诊病例分析[J].中国医院管理,2011,31(11):43-44. 被引量:4

二级参考文献6

共引文献3

同被引文献114

  • 1无,徐凌燕,冯素文,王正平,胡文胜,金静芬,项珍珍,刘根红,王虹.产科急诊预检分诊标准及解读[J].中华急危重症护理杂志,2020,1(2):151-155. 被引量:5
  • 2王蕊,赵毅,陈冬梅.急诊护理分诊的现状及对策[J].华北国防医药,2007,19(5):64-66. 被引量:20
  • 3Thompson T, Stanford K, Dick R, et al. Triage assessment in pediatric emergency departments: a national survey [ J ]. Pedi- atric Emerg Care, 2010, 26 (8) : 554 -558.
  • 4van Veen M, Moll HA. Reliability and validity of triage sys- tems in paediatric emergency care [ J ] . Scand J Trauma Re- susc Emerg Med, 2009, 17 (1) : 38 -46.
  • 5Sven Oredsson, Hgkan Jonsson, Jon Rognes, et al. A system- atic review of triage - related interventions to improve patientflow in emergency departments [ J Emerg Med, 2011, 19:43-51.
  • 6Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, et al. Modem triage in the emergency department [ J ] . Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2010, 107 (50) : 892 - 898.
  • 7Farrokhnia N, G~ransson KE. Swedish emergency department triage and interventions for improved patient flows a national update [J] . Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2011, 19(1) : 72 -77.
  • 8中华人民共和国卫生部.卫生部关于印发《急诊科建设与管理指南(试行)》的通知[S],2009.
  • 9Vinelli N F, Mannucci C, Laba N I, et al. Non-urgent emergency department visits at a childrenrs hospital[J]. Arch Argent Pediatr,2011,109(1) :8- 13.
  • 10Fernandes C M, Tanabe P, Gilboy N, et al. Five-level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA Five-level Triage Task ForcerJ]. J Emerg Nurs,2005,31(1) :39-50,118.

引证文献17

二级引证文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部