期刊文献+

肺保护性通气策略联合一氧化氮吸入治疗小儿重症肺炎合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征10例报道 被引量:10

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨肺保护性通气策略联合一氧化氮(NO)吸入治疗小儿重症肺炎合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2008至2011年收治的10例重症肺炎合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患儿的临床资料,全部病例采用小潮气量通气(6—8ml/k),逐渐增加PEEP(6cm H2O开始,达到10~14cmH2O,1cmH2O=0.098kPa),NO吸入浓度(5—25)×10^-6,同时给予综合治疗,观察疗效。结果10例患儿平均上机时间13.7d,NO吸入时间6.8d,全部患儿均并发多脏器功能障碍(以呼吸衰竭、心力衰竭和胃肠功能衰竭最多),其中合并气胸、纵隔气肿、皮下气肿8例。6例存活,2例死亡,2例放弃治疗后死亡。存活患儿恢复期肺CT表现严重肺大泡3例,纤维化2例。1例形成支气管胸膜漏,经手术修补未愈合再次成漏,患儿放弃治疗后死亡。结论小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征的病死率高,小潮气量通气可减少气压伤,NO吸入可帮助患儿度过严重低氧血症期,从而降低呼吸机参数,二者联合应用有可能降低病死率。
出处 《中国小儿急救医学》 CAS 2014年第1期41-42,共2页 Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Bindl L,Dresbach K,Lentze MJ. Incidence of acute respiratory distresssyndrome in German children and adolescents:Apopulation-based study[J].{H}CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE,2005,(1):209-212.
  • 2Goh AY,Chan PW,Lum LC. Incidence of acute respiratorydistress syndrome:a comparison of two definitions[J].{H}ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD,1998,(3):256-259.
  • 3Timmons OD,Dean JM,Vernon DD. Mortality rates and prognosticvariables in children with adult respiratory distress syndrome[J].{H}Journal of Pediatrics,1991,(6):896-899.
  • 4陆铸今,王莹,汤定华,密越群,孙波.上海市四家儿童医院重症监护室中急性呼吸窘迫综合征发生率调查[J].中华儿科杂志,2003,41(8):619-620. 被引量:11
  • 5Dahlem P,VanAalderen WM,Hamaker ME. Incidence and short-term outcome of acute lung injury in mechanically ventilated children[J].{H}European Respiratory Journal,2003,(6):980-985.
  • 6喻文亮,陆铸今,王莹,施丽萍,匡凤梧,张剑晖,谢敏慧,钱素云,樊寻梅,孙波.小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征前瞻性多中心临床流行病学研究[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2005,14(6):448-453. 被引量:57
  • 7Willson DF,Thomas NJ,Markovitz BP. Effect of exogenoussurfactant (Calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury:a randomizedcontrolled trial[J].{H}JAMA:the Journal of the American Medical Association,2005,(4):470-476.
  • 8Relvas MS,Silver PC,Sagy M. Prone positioning of pediatric patientswith ARDS results in improvement in oxygenation if maintained 》 12 hdaily[J].{H}CHEST,2003,(1):269-274.
  • 9朱荻绮,王莹.肺保护性通气策略在儿童急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用价值[J].中国小儿急救医学,2009,16(3):222-224. 被引量:3

二级参考文献32

  • 1Brower RG,Lanken PN,Maclntyre N,et al. Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Meal,2004,351(4) :327-336.
  • 2Bion J,Jaeschke R,Thompson BT. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock 2008. Intensive Care Med,2008,34( 1 ) :17-60.
  • 3Dellinger PR,Carlet JM,Masur H,et al. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med,2004,32(3) :858-873.
  • 4Bernard GR,Artigas A,Brigham KL,et al. The American-Euro- pean Consensus Conference on ARDS : definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,1994,149(3 Pt 1) :818-824.
  • 5Gregory JR. Current concepts in adult respiratory distress syndrome in children. Curt Opin Pediatr,2001,13 ( 3 ) : 261-266.
  • 6Malhotra A. Low-tidal-volume ventilation in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Me.d, 2007,357 ( 11 ) : 1113- 1120.
  • 7Slutsky AS. Mechanical ventilation : American College of Chest Physicians' Consensus Conference. Chest, 1993,104 ( 6 ) : 1833- 1859.
  • 8The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med,2000,342(18) :1301-1308.
  • 9Amato MB,Barbas CS,Medeiros DM,et al. Benefical effects of the“ open lung approach” with low distending pressures in acute respiratory dislress syndrome. A prospective randomized study on mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Mcd, 1995,152(6 Pt 1):1835-1846.
  • 10Villar J, Kacmarek RM, Perez-Mendez L, et al. A high positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volume ventilatory strategy improves outcome in persistent respiratory distress syndrome:a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med,2006,34 ( 5 ) : 1311 - 1318.

共引文献64

同被引文献97

引证文献10

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部