期刊文献+

龙头企业数量特征对集群创新绩效影响的实证研究 被引量:2

An Empirical Study of How the Quantitative Characteristics of Leading Firms Influence Innovative Performance of Clusters
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于组织学习及集群创新的相关研究进展,以苏南特色产业基地为样本,实证研究了集群龙头企业规模、总量、比重等数量特征对集群创新绩效的作用。研究结果表明,龙头企业相对数比其绝对数对集群创新绩效的作用更为显著;龙头企业绝对数及在集群内的比重并不是越大越好;相反,龙头企业占比越小,集群研发投入和创新绩效越好;龙头企业平均规模越大,集群研发投入越多,集群创新绩效也越好。 Based on the study of organizational learning and cluster innovation,we analyze the influence of quantitative characteristics including number,proportion and scales of leading firms on innovative performance of industrial clusters, using data in Sunan region.The result shows that the relative number of leading firms as a structural variable is more meaningful for innovative performance of clusters than the absolute number of leading firms.At the same time,it is not the more the number and the greater the proportion of leading firms,the better the innovative performance of industrial clusters.Instead the proportion of leading firms is negatively correlated with innovative performance of clusters.Empirical results also show that the larger the average scale of leading firms,the better innovative performance of clusters.
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第24期86-90,共5页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70973045) 江苏省教育厅项目(2010SJB790005) 江苏大学基金项目(11JDG180)
关键词 集群创新 龙头企业 创新绩效 特色产业基地 Cluster Leading Firms R&D Innovative Performance Special Industrial Base
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1MARTIN R,SUNLEY P. Path dependence and regional economic evolution[J].{H}JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY,2006,(04):395-437.
  • 2BOSCHMA R A,FRENKEN K. Cluster evolution and a roadmap for future research[J].{H}REGIONAL STUDIES,2011,(01):1295-1298.
  • 3MENZEL M P D. Fornahl cluster life cycles:dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution[J].{H}INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE,2010,(01):205-238.
  • 4王为东,王文平,朱剑荣,高尚荣.集群中小企业技术创新机制的实证研究[J].统计与决策,2010,26(11):62-64. 被引量:3
  • 5MALIPIERO A,MUNARI F,SOBRERO M. Focal firms as technological gatekeepers within industrial districts:evidence from the packaging machinery industry[A].Skorping,Denmark,2005.27-29.
  • 6MORRISON A. "Gatekeepers of knowledge” within industrial districts:who they are,how they interact[J].{H}REGIONAL STUDIES,2008,(06):817-835.
  • 7RYCHEN F,ZIMMERMAN JB. Clusters in the global knowledge-based economy:knowledge gatekeepers and temporary proximity[J].{H}REGIONAL STUDIES,2008,(06):767-776.
  • 8GRAF H. Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovators[J].{H}CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS,2010,(03).
  • 9BATHELT H,MALMBERG A,MASKELL P. Clusters and knowledge:local buzz,global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation[J].{H}PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY,2004,(01):31-56.
  • 10MARCH J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J].{H}Organization Science,1991,(02):101-123.

二级参考文献10

  • 1McEvily B, Zaheer A. Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Hetero- geneity in Competitive Capabilities[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(12).
  • 2Tsai W. Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation, Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(5).
  • 3Yli-Renko H, Autio E., Sapienza H. J. Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology- based Firm[J].Strategic Management Journal,2001,22.
  • 4Levin D., Cross R. The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer[J]. Management Science, 2004,50(11).
  • 5Tiwana, A. Do Bridging Ties Complement Strong Ties? An Empirical Examination of Alliance Ambidexterity[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2008, (29).
  • 6Levinthal D. March J. The Myopia of Learning[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1993, (14).
  • 7Baker, W. Market Networks and Corporate Behavior[J].American Journal of Sociology,1990,(96).
  • 8Uzzi, B. Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997,(42).
  • 9Kale, P, Singh, H, Perlmutter H. Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital [J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,(21).
  • 10Anderson, J., Gerbing, W.Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach[J].Psychological Bulletin,1988,(103).

同被引文献25

  • 1谢洪明,罗惠玲,王成,李新春.学习、创新与核心能力:机制和路径[J].经济研究,2007,42(2):59-70. 被引量:79
  • 2Porter M E. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1998,76(6) : 77-90.
  • 3Catalan J, Ramon-Mufioz R. Marshall in Iberia: Industrial Dis- tricts and Leading Firms in the Creation of Competitive Advan- tage in Fashion Products [J]. Enterprise and Society, 2013, 23 : 1-33.
  • 4Boix R, Joan T. Industrial Districts, Innovation and I-district Effect: Territory or Industrial Specialization? [J]. European Planning Studies, 2010, 18 (10) : 1707-1729.
  • 5Llonch M. Trademarks, Product differentiation and Competi- tiveness in the Catalan Knitwear Districts during the Twenti- eth Century [J]. Business History 2012,54 (2) : 179-200.
  • 6Lombardi M, Randelli F. The Role of Leading Firms in the Evolution of SMEs Clusters : Evidence from the Leather Prod- ucts Cluster in Florence [RI. Working Paper No. 17,2012.
  • 7Romo F P, Michael S. The Structural Embeddedness of Busi- ness Decisions: The Migration of Manufacturing Plants in New York State, 1960-1985 [J]. American Sociological Re- view, 1995,60: 874-907. [.
  • 8Piore M J, Charles F S. The Second Industrial Divide: Possi- bilities for Prosperity [M]. New York: Basic Books, 1984: 55-56.
  • 9Gulati R. Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995,40(4) : 619-652.
  • 10Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P. Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation [J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2004,28 ( 1 ) : 31-56.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部