期刊文献+

鼻腔胃蛋白酶检测与pH监测法在诊断咽喉反流中的应用 被引量:9

Application of pepsin detection in nasal cavity and pH monitoring in the diagnosis of larynghopharyngeal reflux
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)与咽喉反流(LPR)的相关性,以及鼻腔分泌物中胃蛋白酶浓度检测与24 h咽喉pH监测两种方法在诊断LPR中的应用。方法:对50例CRS患者(CRS组)及20例健康志愿者(对照组),分别行24 h咽喉pH监测和酶联免疫吸附试验测定患者鼻腔分泌物中胃蛋白酶浓度。结果:CRS患者行24 h pH监测示LPR的发生率为84%,对照组为25%,两组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。CRS组胃蛋白酶阳性率在为88%,对照组为30%,两组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。以鼻腔分泌物中胃蛋白酶浓度作为LPR的诊断指标,灵敏度为88%,特异度为70%,误诊率为30%,漏诊率为12%。配对卡方检验Kappa=0.765,两种检查方法一致性较好。结论:鼻腔分泌物中胃蛋白酶浓度检测可作为LPR诊断的可靠指标。 Objective To explore the application of pepsin detection in nasal cavity and pH monitoring in the diagnosis of larynghopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Methods Fifty patients with CR$ and 20 healthy volunteers were recruited. They received 24-hour pH monitoring in larynghopharyngeal and pepsin detection in nasal cavity by enzyme -linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA). Results The LPR incidence rate in CRS patients by 24-hour pH monitoring was significant higher than that in healthy volunteers group (P 〈 0.01)(84%, 25%, respectively). The pepsin positive rate was significant higher than that in healthy volunteers group(P 〈 0.01)(88%, 30%, respectively). The pepsin concentration in nasal secretions was used in the diagnosis index of LPR, the sensitivity, specificity, misdiagnosis rate and the missed diagnosis were g8%, 70%, 30%, 12%, respectively. The method was well consistent with the examination of pH monitoring (Kappa 〉 0.75, P 〈 0.01). Conclusion The examination of pepsin in nasal secretions may provided believable indicator for the diagnosis of LPR.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第3期400-402,共3页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
基金 江西省教育厅青年科学基金资助项目(编号:GJJ11207)
关键词 鼻窦炎 咽喉反流 胃蛋白酶 PH监测 Sinusitis Larynghopharyngeal reflux Pepsin pH monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献62

  • 1刘红刚,何春燕,徐东群,王先忠,梁乐,陈红.空气细颗粒物与慢性鼻窦炎组织形态学相关关系的初探[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2004,22(5):340-342. 被引量:9
  • 2朱珠,蔡乐.质子泵抑制剂的安全性与合理应用[J].药物不良反应杂志,2005,7(2):81-90. 被引量:56
  • 3韩德民,周兵,刘华超,边岩松,范尔钟,史秀英,王鸿,诸小侬.鼻内窥镜鼻窦手术几项与疗效有关因素的探讨[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1996,31(1):12-15. 被引量:90
  • 4王晓晔,韩德民,叶京英.咽喉反流[J].国际耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,30(5):281-285. 被引量:46
  • 5杨锦蓉,张幸,王菁,钱亚玲,汪严华,陈雅萍.浙江省制衣业二甲基甲酰胺职业危害状况调查[J].中国工业医学杂志,2006,19(5):299-300. 被引量:8
  • 6Ford CN. Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux. JAMA, 2005, 294: 1534-1540.
  • 7Karkos PD, Potamianos SP, Apostolidis MT, et al. When gastroenterology met otolaryngology: laryngopharyngeal reflux. Am J Med, 2006, 119: e19-20.
  • 8Salminen P, Sala E, Koskenvuo J, et al. Reflux laryngitis: a feasible indication for laparoscopic antireflux surgery? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2007, 17 : 73-78.
  • 9Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2002, 127 : 32-35.
  • 10Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) : a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope, 1991, 101 (4 Pt 2 Suppl 53 ) : 1-78.

共引文献114

同被引文献60

引证文献9

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部