期刊文献+

完整结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌的短期疗效和安全性评价 被引量:42

Short-term efficacy and safety of complete mesocolic excision for treatment of colon cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)治疗结肠癌的短期疗效及其安全性的相关影响因素。方法回顾性分析我科47例行传统根治手术(CME组)及38例行完整结肠系膜切除术(传统组)治疗结肠癌的患者临床资料,比较2组患者相关影响因素及短期疗效。结果 CME组与传统手术组平均清扫淋巴结分别为(21.6±7.5)枚、(13.9±7.1)枚,且在各期手术淋巴结清扫数目显著多于传统手术组,存活率、复发率上分别为100%和80.9%,10.5%和46.8%,术后排气、排便及住院时间无显著差异,CME组的并发症率也低于传统手术组。结论完整结肠系膜切除术增加了周围淋巴结的清扫,是提高结肠癌患者术后存活率,降低复发率的有效措施,能提高手术质量,疗效确实、可靠。 Objective To investigate the short-term efficacy and safety-related factors of the complete mesocolic excision and traditional operation for treating colon cancer. Methods The data of 38 patients with colon cancer who received complete mesocolic excision and 47 ca- ses who treated by traditional operation were analyzed retrospectively, and the short-term efficacy and relative factors were compared. Results The average cleaned lymph nodes of CME group and traditional group were respectively (21.6 -7.5 ) and (13.9 + 7.1 ), and the number of cleaned lymph nodes at every stage of surgery in CME group was significantly more than that in traditional group. The survival rates and the recurrence rates of two groups were respectively 100% vs. 80.9% , 10.5% vs. 46.8%. There was no significant difference in the postopera- tive exhaust, defecation and hospitalization time. But the rate of complications in CME group was lower than that in traditional group. Conclu- sion For patients with colon cancer,the complete mesocolic excision can clean the surrounding lymph nodes,improve the survival rate, re- duce the relapse rate, which enhances the quality of operation, improves surgical safety, with reliable efficacy, and worthy of further research and extension in clinic.
作者 陈金元
出处 《局解手术学杂志》 2014年第1期74-76,共3页 Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
关键词 完整结肠系膜切除术 传统根治术 结肠癌 疗效 complete mesocolic excision traditional operation colon cancer efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献61

  • 1罗勇,吴伟主.改良右半结肠切除术并顺行性淋巴结清扫治疗右半结肠癌疗效观察[J].中国全科医学,2009,12(6):502-503. 被引量:10
  • 2吴承堂,谭建美.大肠癌术后肠道菌群变化的临床研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2004,19(6):334-336. 被引量:36
  • 3Marshall JC. The gut as a potential trigger of exercise-induced inflammatory responses[J]. Can J phsiol pharmacalol , 1998, 76(5) :479-484.
  • 4汪建平.结直肠癌.见:陈孝平主编.外科学.第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.626.
  • 5Liu BS,Xu YC,Wang H,et al editor in chief.The Oncology of Colorectal and Anus.Chengdu:Sichuan Science and Technology Press,1988.569-585.
  • 6Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocohc excision and central liga- tion--technical notes and outcome [Jl. Colorectal Dis,2009,11 (4):354-364.
  • 7West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, et al. Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a ret- rospective observational study [J]. Lancet Oncol,2008,9(9): 857-865.
  • 8Pramateftakis MG. Optimizing colonic cancer surgery: high liga- tion and complete mesocolic excision during right hemicolectomy [J]. Tech Coloproctol,2010,14 (suppl 1):49-51.
  • 9Guillou P J, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSIC trial): muhicentre, ran- domized controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2005,365(8): 1718-1726.
  • 10West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, et al. Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a ret-rospective observational study [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2008,9(9): 857-865.

共引文献231

同被引文献221

引证文献42

二级引证文献167

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部