期刊文献+

学校课程实施过程质量评估框架案例研究 被引量:10

A Case Study on the Index Framework of School Curriculum Implementation Process Quality Assessment
原文传递
导出
摘要 学校教育质量是评价课程改革成效与现状的关键表征,学校课程实施过程质量则是学校教育质量的重要组成部分,也是评估改革成效的关键指标。笔者以苏格兰及香港地区学校质量保障体系为例,比较分析两地三则学校课程实施过程质量评估的框架及质量信息获取途径,揭示其"大同小异"背后的理论假设和课程现实的差异,提出构建本土化学校课程实施过程质量评估框架必须立足本土课程现实、构建理论假设,重视"教师-方案-学生"互动,贯彻框架、工具与目的的一致性。 Quality of school education is a pivotal token in sketching the achievement and actuality of current curriculum reformation. As a crucial component of school educational quality, the quality of school curriculum implementation process is a key index for granted when evaluating the reformation. In order to draw lessons through case study, this article would introduce the index frameworks of school curriculum implementation process quality assessment in Scotland and Hong Kong, unveil their methods of collecting quality information, and distinguish them by theoretical hypothesis and curriculum facts. It is likely to propose some corresponding highlights for structure a similar framework in China, such as finding a foothold on indigenous curriculum facts, establishing theoretical hypothesis, setting high store by the triple interactions among teacher, curriculum program and student, and keeping inner consistency among the index framework, the tools and the goal of assessment.
作者 王冰如
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第24期11-15,共5页 Research in Educational Development
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"义务教育阶段学校课程实施过程质量评估的理论和技术研究(11JJD880003)的部分成果
关键词 学校课程实施过程质量 评估框架 学校教育质量 学校质量保障体系 苏格兰 香港 quality of school curriculum implementation process, assessment index framework, school educational quality, schoolquality assurance system, Scotland, Hong Kong
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献68

  • 1Leithwood. K A (ed.). (1982). Studies in Curriculum Decision Making. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE)Press.
  • 2Ornstein, A C & Hunkins, F P (1998). Curriculum:Foundations, Principles, and Issues. Third edition. Boston:Allyn and Bacon. p. 292.
  • 3Fullan, M, et al. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change. Second edition. Cassell Educational Limited. P48.
  • 4Ornstein, A C & Hunkins, F P (1998). Curriculum:Foundations, Principles, and Issues. Third edition.Boston:Allyn and Bacon. p. 297.
  • 5Posner, G J (1992). Analyzing the Curriculum. McGraw-Hill,Inc. p. 10.
  • 6Snyder,J ,Bolin,F ,& Zumwalt,K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P W Jackson(Ed. ),handbook of research on curriculum, pp. 402-435. New York :Macmillan.
  • 7杨明全著.论教师参与课程变革:第1版[M].上海科技教育出版社,2003年10月.第111页.
  • 8张善培.课程实施程度的测量[J].当代华人教育学报,1998,.
  • 9欧用生.课程领导-议题与趋势.台北:高等教育出版社,2004
  • 10欧用生.建立课程的公共性—课程公共论述的危机与出路[J].教育研究集刊,(1):1-1.

共引文献41

同被引文献67

引证文献10

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部