摘要
目的:探讨阿曲库胺与琥,自胆碱在无抽搐电休克治疗(MECT)中的应用比较。方法:选择18—60岁,ASAI-Ⅱ级,无截瘫、烧伤、过敏史、高血钾等器质性疾病的精神分裂症患者。随机分为阿曲库铵组(A组),阿曲库铵、新斯的明组(B组),琥珀胆碱组(C组),分别观察注药后肌松药起效时间、MECT治疗后呼吸恢复时间、呼吸恢复情况、病人完全清醒时间。结果与A组、B组相比较,C组病人肌松药起效时间、呼吸恢复时间,呼吸恢复情况快、短、好(P〈0.05)。B纽呼吸恢复时间较A纽快短(P〈0.05),肌松起效时间、呼吸恢复情况差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。三组病人完全清醒时间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:在无琥珀胆碱情况下,阿曲库铵与新斯的明合用不失为一种可行的MECT治疗方法。
Objective To compare the effect of both atracurium and suxamethonium in moden non convulsively electuoconvulsive therapy(MECT). Meth- od Sixth mental patients aged from eighting to sixty, ASA I-II except for paraplegia, fire burn,allergy, hyperkalemia and other organic diseases were ran- domly divided into 3 groups: atracurium group (group A, n : 20),atracurium compound with neostigmine group (group B, n = 20)and suxamethonium group (group C, n =20). Muscle relaxation onset time,breathing recovery time, recovery feeling and awake time were observed respectively. Result Muscle relaxation onset time, breathing recovery time, recovery feeling and awake time in group C were shorter and better than that in group A and group B (P〈0.05). Breathing recovery time in group B was shorter than that in group A(P〈0.05). Muscle relaxation onset time and recovery feeling in group B have no statistical difference than that in group A. Awake time among three groups have no significance statistical difference. Conclusion Atracurium com- pound with neostigmine is a good method in moden non convulsively electuoeonvulsive therapy if there has no Auxamethonium.
出处
《中医学报》
CAS
2013年第B12期69-69,共1页
Acta Chinese Medicine