无砷失活剂Antipulp与碧兰麻在根管治疗中的效果比较

Comparison of Antipulp an Primacaine in treating root canal

目的对Antipulp与碧兰麻在根管治疗中的无痛效果进行比较。方法选择磨牙(6-7)龋源性急、慢性牙髓炎患者280例,随机分成2组,一组封Antipulp失活后进行根管治疗;另一组注射碧兰麻后进行牙髓根管治疗。采用标尺VAS法评价2种方法在根管治疗中的无痛效果。结果在上颌磨牙组的治疗中,Antipulp组的无痛效果优良率达到80.8%;碧兰麻组的无痛效果优良率达到88.2%。在下颌磨牙组的治疗中,Antipulp组的无痛效果优良率为83.3%;碧兰麻组为69.4%。结论在下颌磨牙急、慢性牙髓炎的根管治疗中,Antipulp的无痛效果优良率高于碧兰麻。

Objective To compare the painless effects of Antipulp and Primacaine in treating root canal. Methods Molars （6-7） 280 cases of caries pulpitis were randomly divided into two groups, One group patients in the experiment group were given Antipulp, and patients in the other group were given Primacaine. The painless effects examined with the VAS scale method in treating root canal t were compared. Results For the treatment of maxillary molar, the painless excellent rate in Antipulp group was 80.8%, the excellent rate in Primacaine group was 88.2%. For the treatment of mandibular molar, the painless excellent rate in Antipulp group was 83.3%, the excellent rate in Primacaine group was 69.4%. Conclusion During the root canal treatment for mandibular Pulpitis, the treating effects byusing Antipulp are better than that of using Primacaine.