期刊文献+

高温原油管道内外检测数据对比分析 被引量:24

Comparative analysis between internal and external inspection data for high temperature crude oil pipeline
原文传递
导出
摘要 以同一时期进行内外检测的某条原油管道A站至B站管段作为研究对象,对内检测发现的管道外腐蚀结果与外检测数据评价结果进行对比分析。结果表明:管道外腐蚀点远多于外防腐层缺陷点;由于阴极保护的作用,外防腐层缺陷点处管体良好,未见明显腐蚀;管道外腐蚀风险点在防腐层剥离的区域。可以利用内检测数据评价管道防腐层的剥离情况,现有的外检测技术具有局限性。针对外检测技术的局限性,提出在管道外检测及日常管理过程中,应加大直接开挖检查力度,对管道外防腐措施的有效性进行评价,以确保管道的安全运行。(图2,表1,参7)。 This paper targets at identifying the pros and cons of the internal and extemal inspection in evaluating external corrosion pipeline. Taking a section of certain crude oil pipeline from station A to station B as the studying object, a comparative analysis between the external corrosion pipe identified through the inside inspection and the data evaluation results from external inspection is conducted. The results show that the corrosion pits outside the pipeline are far more than the defect points in the external coating. Due to cathodic protection, the pipe body at the defect points is good, without obvious corrosion. The corrosion risk points outside the pipeline are distributed in the disbonding coating area. The internal inspection data can be used to evaluate the coating disbonding degree, while existing extemal inspection techniques have some limitations. In view of the limitations, it is proposed that in the external inspection and daily management of pipeline, direct excavation should be done in larger scale to evaluate the effectiveness of external corrosion control measures of the pipeline to make sure safe operation. (2 Figures, 1 Table, 7 References)
出处 《油气储运》 CAS 2014年第1期69-72,共4页 Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
关键词 原油管道 内检测 外检测 数据对比 crude oil pipeline, intemal inspection, extemal inspection, data comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献8

共引文献74

同被引文献186

  • 1胡朋,史冠男,张庆保,陈金忠,马义来,何俊.基于多轮内检测数据的对齐和比对[J].无损检测,2022,44(6):36-39. 被引量:3
  • 2郑贤斌,陈国明,袁超红.油气管道缺陷检测的数据处理方法回顾与展望[J].压力容器,2005,22(10):38-43. 被引量:10
  • 3陈洪玉,刘兴,教立新.埋地煤气管道局部腐蚀原因分析[J].表面技术,2006,35(4):80-81. 被引量:7
  • 4郑伟,帅健.埋地管道外防腐蚀体系的检测与评价[J].石油化工腐蚀与防护,2007,24(6):20-23. 被引量:5
  • 5DESJARDINS Guy, NICKLE Randy. Comparison of in- line inspection service provider magnetic fiux leakage (MFL) technology and analytical performance based on multiple runs on pipeline segment[C]. IPC 2012-90251,.
  • 62012. GU B, KANIA R, SHARMA S, et al. Approach to assessment of corrosion growth in pipelines[C]. IPC2002-27243,2002.
  • 7REBER K, BELLER M. Run comparisons: Using in-line inspection data for the assessment of pipeline[C]. Hannover: Pipeline Technology 2006 Conference, 2006.
  • 8KARIYAWASAM Shahani, WANG Hong. Learning from multiple corrosion growth rate (run-comparison)studies[C]. NACE2011-11303, 2011.
  • 9Anonymity. Special online collection: Dealing with data[EB/ OL]. 2012-10-02 [2014-07-31]. http://www.sciencemag.org/site/ special/data.
  • 10金强,崔红升,骆科东,等.SY/T6183-2012石油行业数据字典管道分册[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2012.

引证文献24

二级引证文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部