期刊文献+

腐蚀坑形貌对油气管道失效压力的影响 被引量:12

Corrosion pit morphology on the impact of oil and gas pipeline failure pressure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 ASME B 31G规范把复杂的腐蚀坑剖面曲线简化成矩形或抛物线投影,是造成ASME B 31G规范预测结果出现保守和不稳定性的重要原因。文章采用非线性有限元方法,综合分析了腐蚀坑剖面面积和腐蚀坑形状系数对腐蚀管道失效压力的影响,提出一种新的以腐蚀坑剖面面积和腐蚀坑形状系数描述腐蚀坑形貌的B31G修正公式,实际算例表明新提出的B31G修正公式的预测结果保守性低,预测误差稳定。 The failure pressure of oil and gas pipeline with different morphology of corrosion pits was anal- ysed by using the nonlinear finite element method. The impact of the cross-section area of corrosion pit on pipeline failure pressure with the axial and circumferential corrosion was researched. The analysis showed that the cross-sect/on area of corrosion pits seriously influenced the failure pressure of pipeline with axial corrosion, however, which was not enough to fully describe the effects of the morphology of corrosion pits on pipeline failure pressure. The research considered the effects of the morphology of corrosion pits by using the cross-section area of corrosion pit and form factor of corrosion pit to descripe on pipeline failure pressure, and proposed a new B31G correction formula. The results show that forecast error and the fluctu- ation range of the error are little using the formula.
出处 《船舶力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期124-131,共8页 Journal of Ship Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(No.51006123)
关键词 油气管道 腐蚀坑形貌 腐蚀坑剖面面积 腐蚀坑形状系数 有限元法 oil and gas pipelines corrosion pit morphology corrosion pit cross-section area corrosion pit form factor finite element method
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Fu B, Kirkwood M G. Prediction failure pressure of internally corroded line pipe using the finite element method[C]//In- ternational Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. OMAE. Copenhagen, Denmark, 1995: 165-184.
  • 2Batte A D, Fu B, Kirkwood M G, et al. New methods for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipeline[C]//In- ternational Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. OMAE. Yokohama, Japan, 1997: 221-228.
  • 3Klever F J, Palmer A C, Kyriakides S. Limit state design of high temperature pipeline[C]//International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. OMAE. Houston, Texas, USA, 1994: 196-203.
  • 4Chouchaoui B A. Evaluation of the remaining strength of corroded pipelines[D]. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Canada, 1993.
  • 5Cronin D S. Assessment of corrosion damage in pipelines[D]. Department of Mechanic Engineering, University of Warter- 1oo, Canada, 2000.
  • 6Cronin D S, Roy J, Pick R J. Prediction of the failwe pressure for complex corrosion defects[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2002, 79: 279-287.
  • 7Chouchaoui B A, Pick R J. A three level assessment of the residual strength of corroded line pipe[C]//International Con- ference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. OMAE. Houston, USA, 1994:9-18.
  • 8Stephens D R, Leis B N. Development of an alternative criterion for residual strength of corrosion defects in moderate-to- high-toughness pipe[C]//Proceedings of International Pipeline Conference. ASME Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2000: 781- 792.
  • 9Kiefner J F, Vieth P H. New method corrects criterion for evaluating corroded pipe[J]. Oil and Gas Journal, 1990, 8(6): 56-59.
  • 10Kiefner J F. Corroded pipe: Strength and repair methods[C]//Symposium on line pipe research. Houston, Texas, 1974, 11: 320-322.

二级参考文献43

  • 1王正涛 ,李著信 ,褚家荣 .含缺陷管道评价标准及方法研究[J].后勤工程学院学报,2004,20(4):76-79. 被引量:7
  • 2帅健,张春娥,陈福来.腐蚀管道剩余强度评价方法的对比研究[J].天然气工业,2006,26(11):122-125. 被引量:88
  • 3[1]Kiefner J F, Vieth P H. New method corrects criterion for evaluating corroded pipe. Oil and Gas Journal, 1990, August(6):56 ~ 59.
  • 4[2]Kiefner J F. Corroded pipe: strength and repair methods, symposium on line pipe research. Houston, Texas, 1974,Nov:320 ~ 322.
  • 5[3]Mok D R B, Pick R J, Lover A G G. Behavior If line pipe with long external corrosion. Materials Performance, 1990, May: 75 ~ 79.
  • 6[4]Coulson K E W, Worthingham R G. Standard damage assessment approach is overly conservative. Oil and Gas Journal, 1990,9(April):54~ 59.
  • 7[5]O' Grade T J, Hisey D T, Kiefner J F. Method for evaluating corroded pipe addresses variety of patterns. Oil and Gas Journal, 1992,12:77 ~82.
  • 8[6]Maxey W A, Kiefmer J F, Eiber R J, Duffy A R. Ductile fracture initiation, propagation, and arrest in cylindrical vessels. Fracture Toughness Proceedings of the 1971 National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, Part Ⅱ . ASTM STP 514 American Society for Testing and Materials, 1972.70 ~ 80.
  • 9[7]Mandelbrot B B. The fractal geometry of nature. San Fancisco:Freeman, 1983.
  • 10[8]Duane S Cronin, Roy J Pick. Experimental database for corroded pipe:evaluation of RSTRENG and B31G. International Pipeline Conference,Canada, University of Waterloo,2000.

共引文献127

同被引文献90

引证文献12

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部