区分两类领主属宾句的实证理据和理论意义

The Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Significance of Distinguishing Two Types of Unaccusative Constructions with Possessor-subject and Possessum-object

对于语言机制的整体运作而言,在心理词库中储存一定数量的预制性语块单位,同时依据自然语言的推导程序生成无限多的规范句型是两种相辅相成的句式生成手段。据此对汉语领主句的分析表明,习语性领主句和常规性领主句的区分既符合语言学理论的断言,也与传统语法的描述一致。常规句法检测结果显示,这种分类的确显现出两类领主句具有本质不同。文章认为,汉语句法研究应该意识到,各种语言学理论应该并存,而且应该以差异性和互补性作为基本特征。

For the integrated working of the language faculty, the store-up of pre-fabricated formulaic chunks in the mental lexicon and the canonical structures based on derivational procedures are the two basic means that natural languages employ. Based on this view, the analysis of UCPP in Chinese reveals that the division of UCPP into Idiomatic type and Canonical type are in full accordance with the theoretical claims and the traditional descriptions. The standard syntactic tests show that such a division makes visible the fundamental differences between these two types of UCPP. This article proposes that the syntactic research should be well aware of the difference and complementarity between differing theories.