期刊文献+

《上海中医药杂志》临床治疗研究论文评价 被引量:4

Assessment of the Thesis on Clinical Research in Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解我国中医药领域临床治疗研究论文现状 ,改进和提高论文的学术水平 ,按照循证医学标准 ,对《上海中医药杂志》1980至 1998年的全部临床治疗研究论文进行回顾性检索和分析。19年间的临床治疗研究论文共计 1971篇 ,其中随机对照试验 (RCTs) 181篇 ,占 9 18% ;临床对照试验 (CCTs) 195篇 ,占 9 89%。《上海中医药杂志》的临床治疗研究论文质量较高 ,且近年有可喜进步。但我国中医药临床研究科研设计尚不够严谨 ,存在一些问题 ,影响研究结果的真实性。运用现代流行病学方法 ,加强科研设计 。 To know the current condition of the thesis on clinical researches of Chinese medicine in China and to improve it,all the theses on clinical research in Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine between 1980~1998 were retrieved and analyzed in light of the standard of evidence based.Among the total 1971 theses,random control test(RCT)was applied in 181(9 18%)and clinical control test(CCT)in 195(9 89%).Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine presents high quality theses and makes a great improvement.However,scientific project of clinical study is not rigorous enough,which affects the theses.It is crucial to enhance the programm to imrpove the theses.
出处 《上海中医药杂志》 北大核心 2000年第11期46-48,共3页 Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词 《上海医药杂志》 科研设计 RCT Random control test clinical control test Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine scientific research project
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献32

同被引文献36

  • 1郭新峰,温泽淮,老膺荣,赖世隆.临床试验质量评价工具及其应用[J].中国循证医学杂志,2004,4(7):484-487. 被引量:34
  • 2宋苹,罗翌,老膺荣,唐雪春.穿琥宁注射液治疗急性呼吸道感染研究文献的质量评价[J].中国中医急症,2005,14(7):677-678. 被引量:4
  • 3Ma B.Quality analysis and recommendations of randomized controlled trials on treating Alzheimer's Disease by Traditional Chinese Medicine[J].Traditional Chinese Medicine Journal of Liaonin Province,2004.31(3):203-204马斌.中医药治疗老年痴呆-随机对照资料的
  • 4Wang X,Liu Q,Yue XQ,Hou FG,Deng WZ,Gu W,Shen XB.Quality assessment of clinical studies on treating the primary carcinoma of liver with Traditional Chinese Medicine[J].Traditional Chinese Medicine Journal of Hunan College,2003;23(4):50-52王喜,刘庆
  • 5Nicolucci A; Grilli R; Alexanian AA,Apolone G,Torri V,Liberati.A.Quality,
  • 6S.Marsoni,W.Torri,A.Taiana,A.Gambino,R.Grilli,P.Liati,M.G.Franzosi,V.Pistotti,F.Parazzini,F.Focarile.Critical review of the quality and development of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and their influence on th
  • 7Moher D,Pham B,Jones A,Cook DJ,Jaded AR,Moher M,Tugwell P.Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses[J].Lancet,1998; 352(9 128):609-613.
  • 8Moher D,Jadad AR,Nichol G,Penman M,Tugwell P,Walsh S.Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials:an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists[J].Control Clin Trials,1995; 21(16):62-73.
  • 9Jadad AR,Moore RA,Carroll D,Jenkinson C,ReynoldsDJ,Gavaghan DJ,McQuay HJ.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:Is blinding necessary[J].Control Clin Trials,1996,12(17):1-12.
  • 10Chalmers TC,Smith H,Blackburn B,Silverman B,Schroeder B,Reitman D,Ambroz A.A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial[J].Controlled Clin Trials,1981;2(3):31-49.

引证文献4

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部