期刊文献+

清水压裂中支撑剂输送沉降行为的CFD模拟 被引量:41

CFD Simulation of Proppant Transportation and Settling in Water Fracture Treatments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 清水压裂技术具有成本低、对地层伤害小等优点,在页岩气等致密气藏开采中得到广泛应用,压裂过程中的湍流效应、颗粒间及颗粒与壁面的相互作用等是影响支撑剂输送沉降行为的重要因素。针对传统支撑剂沉降计算方法没有考虑流固、固固间双向耦合的缺点,建立了欧拉–欧拉两相流模型研究支撑剂在清水压裂过程中的输运沉降行为,模型考虑了流动的湍流效应、高浓度下颗粒间的摩擦应力,并利用Johnson–Jackson边界条件考虑颗粒与壁面间的作用。利用该模型研究了不同进口速度及位置、砂粒密度等参数条件下平板裂缝中压裂液与支撑剂的两相流流动,模拟结果与实验符合度较高,验证了模型的有效性。同时文中也讨论了这些参数对支撑剂输送沉降规律的影响。 Water hydraulic fracture treatments are widely used in of exploitation for tight gas reservoirs such as shale gas because of its low cost and little damage to formation's permeability. In the process of fracturing, turbulence effects, particle-particle and particle-wall interactions are important factors which affect proppant transportation and settling behavior. Because conventional proppant settlement calculation methods don't consider the two-way coupling of fluid-solid and solid-solid, Euler-Euler two- phase flow model is established to study the proppant transportation and settling behavior in the process of water-fracturing. Turbulence effects and friction stress between high concentration particles are taken into consideration to study the particle- wall interaction, and Johnson-Jackson boundary conditions are also considered. By using this model, the two-phase flow of fracturing fluid and proppant in the slot under different inlet-velocity position, particle density are studied. The simulation results coincide with experimental results well, which verifies the effectiveness of the model used. In the meanwhile, the effect of these parameters to proppant transportation and settling law is also discussed in the paper.
出处 《西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期74-82,共9页 Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金"页岩油藏网络裂缝导流模型研究"(51374178) 储层增产改造四川省青年科技创新研究团队(2011JTD0009)
关键词 清水压裂 支撑剂 输送沉降 固液两相流 双流体模型 water fracture treatments proppant transportation and settling liquid-solid multiphase flow two-fluid model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1温庆志,翟恒立,罗明良,胡蓝霄,黄越,黄波,李佳琦.页岩气藏压裂支撑剂沉降及运移规律实验研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2012,19(6):104-107. 被引量:61
  • 2Britt L, Smith M, Haddad Z, et al. Waterfracs: We do need proppant after all[C]. SPE 102227, 2006.
  • 3Palisch T. Vincent M, Handren P. Slickwater fracturing: Food for thought[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2010, 25(3) : 327-344.
  • 4Gadde P B, Sharma M M. The impact of proppant retar- dation on propped fracture length[C]. SPE 97106, 2005.
  • 5Wang J, Joseph D D, Patankar N A, et al. Bi-power law correlations for sediment transport in pressure driven channel flows[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2003,29 (3): 475-494.
  • 6Eskin D. Modeling non-Newtonian slurry convection in a vertical fracture[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009. 64(7) : 1591-1599.
  • 7Tsai K, Fonseca E. Degaleesan S. Advanced computa- tional modeling of proppant settling in water fractures for shale gas production[C]. SPE 151607, 2012.
  • 8Agrawal K, Loezos P N, Syamlal M, et al. The role of meso-scale structures in rapid gas-solid flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001,445 ( 1 ) : 151-185.
  • 9Wang W. Li J. Simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow by a multi-scale CFD approach of the EMMS model to the sub-grid level[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62 ( 1 ) : 208-231.
  • 10Srivastava A, Sundaresan S. Analysis of a frictional- kinetic model for gas-particle flow[J]. Powder Technolo- gy, 2003, 129( 1 ) : 72-85.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Economides M J,Nolte K G.油藏增产措施[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002,16-18/609-634.
  • 2Palisch T T, Vincent M C.Slickwater fracturing-food for thought[R].SPE 115766,2008.
  • 3Brucato A,Grisafi F, Montante G.Particle drag coefficients in tur-bulent fluids [J].Chemical Engineering Science, 1998,53 ( 18):3 295-3 314.
  • 4Medlin W L,Sexton J H,Zumwalt G L.Sand transport experimentsin thin fluids[R].SPE 14469,1985.
  • 5Liu Y,Sharma M M.Effect of fracture width and fluid rheology onproppant settling and retardation: an experimental study [R].SPE96208,2005.
  • 6Adam Dayan, Shaun Stracener, Peter Clark.Proppant transport inslick-water fracturing of shale-gas formations [ R ] .SPE 125068,2009.
  • 7Barree R D, Conway M W.Experimental and numerical modelingof convective proppant transport [ R ].SPE 28564,1995.
  • 8Gadde P B, Sharma M M.The impact of proppant retardation onpropped fracture lengths [ R ] .SPE 97106,2005.
  • 9Kirkby L L, Rockefeller H A.Proppant setting velocities in non-flowing slurries [R].SPE 13906,1985.
  • 10王雷,张士诚.压裂液返排速度对支撑剂回流量及其在裂缝内分布的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2008,15(1):101-102. 被引量:21

共引文献60

同被引文献323

引证文献41

二级引证文献205

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部