摘要
近年来,土司研究发展成果十分丰富,土司研究已渐成为学术之热点。然而近读关于明代土司之论述,颇感一些学者对于明代土司之理解有误,有将东北、西北"番夷"误入土司之列,究其主要原因,是《明史》作者为统治者讳,有意含混其词,令今人误读所致。
The recent Tusi studies has produced quite a few findings in various aspects but some scholars have such misunderstanding of "Tusi" in the Ming dynasty as the classification of some mi- nority chieftains in northwest and northeast China into "Tusi'. The major cause of such misunder- standing originates from their misunderstanding of "Tusi" in A History of the Ming Dynasty due to its author's ambiguous definition of "Tusi" .
出处
《云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期38-41,共4页
Journal of Yunnan Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
明代
土官
夷官
土司
Ming dynasty
Tu official~ minority official
history
Tusi