期刊文献+

奉化市2009—2011年常住人口死亡漏报及死因监测质量评价 被引量:4

Surveillance quality evaluation on death under-reporting and death causes in resident population of Fenghua City in 2009-2011
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]了解奉化市死因监测工作的漏报情况,准确估计人群死亡率和婴儿死亡率。[方法]根据《全国疾病监测系统死因漏报调查方案》要求,采用捕获-标记-再捕获的原理,对样本乡镇2009—2011年的全部死亡病例进行回顾调查,通过"死因漏报系统"与《中国疾病预防控制信息系统》的死因报告登记系统进行比较,确定漏报率。[结果]样本镇经漏报调查确定死亡者共855例,经死因报告登记系统确定死亡者共853例,漏报2例,漏报率为0.23%。漏报调查死亡率为7.10‰。死者生前最高诊断单位为县级及以上医疗机构的比例为96.61%,未就诊比例为0.58%。编码不准确率为3.51%。[结论]奉化市2009—2011年全国疾病监测系统死因监测工作的漏报率较低,完整性较好,死因诊断质量可靠。 Abstract : [ Objective ] To investigate the under-reporting rate of death and its causes registration, and to accurately estimate the death rates of the population and infants in Fenghua City. [ Methods ] According to the "Survey Program of National Disease Surveillance System on Death Under-reporting", a retrospective investigation was done of death under-reporting in the sample villages in 2009 -2011 on the principle of Capture-mark-recapture. The data from investigation have been checked up and compared with that on death causes registration surveillance obtained through "Death Under-reporting System" and "China Information System for Diseases Control and Prevention" so as to determine the under-reporting rate. [ Re- suits] A total of 855 death cases were determined by the under-reporting investigation on all sample villages, and the total of 853 death eases were reported by the death causes registration system. Two cases were omitted, with under-reporting rate being 0.23%. The omission mortality in survey was 7.10%o. The proportion of the deceased highest diagnostic units and medical institutions above county level was 96.61%. The proportion of not seeking treatment was 0.58%. The inaccurate coding rate was 3.51%. [ Conclusion] In 2009 -2011 in Fenghua City,death under-reporting rate was low, integrity good and death diag- nosis reliable in terms of death monitoring work stipulated by national disease monitoring system.
出处 《上海预防医学》 CAS 2014年第1期31-34,共4页 Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine
关键词 死因监测 漏报率 质量评价 Survey of death causes Under-reporting rate Evaluation on quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献21

  • 1曾光,王克安.现代流行病学:第五讲 介绍几种快速流行病学评价方法[J].中华流行病学杂志,1993,14(2):113-117. 被引量:3
  • 2周脉耕,王玉英,葛辉,王黎君,马家奇,杨功焕.中国2004年县及县以上医疗机构死亡病例报告质量评价[J].中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(4):328-332. 被引量:53
  • 3封宝琴,张燕萍,齐惠萍,张晓平,李海平.死因监测质量评价方法及应用[J].疾病监测,2007,22(3):203-205. 被引量:8
  • 4高尔升等.医学人口学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2004,261-263.
  • 5Rao C, Lopez AD,Yang G,et al.Evaluating national cause-of-death statistics:principles and application to the case of China[J].Bull World Health Organ, 2005,83 : 618-625.
  • 6中华人民共和国卫生部.2008年度中央财政转移支付地方慢病综合干预控制项目慢病监测(死因)漏报调查、营养与健康监测工作进展情况[EB/OL].http://www.mob.gov.en.2009-12-25.
  • 7Colin DM, Doris MF, Mie I, et al. Counting the dead and what they died of: an assessment of the global status of cause of death data [J]. Bull WHO, 2005, 83: 171-177.
  • 8International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting.Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation Ⅰ:History and theoretical development.Am J Epidemiol,1995,142(10):1047-1058.
  • 9McCarty DJ,Tull ES,Moy CS,et al.Ascertainment corrected rates:applications of capture-recapture methods.Int J Epidemiol,1993,22 (3):559-565.
  • 10Nanan DJ,White F.Capture-recapture:reconnaissance of a demographic technique in epidemiology.Chronic Dis Can,1997,18(4):144-148.

共引文献193

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部