美国高等教育组织治理模式的路径变迁研究被引量：1

Transition of the Path for Governance of Higher Education Organization in the United States

下载PDF

导出

摘要以美国高等教育组织治理的研究文献为主要来源,对20世纪60年代以来高等教育组织治理模式的研究进行了历史阶段划分,并对每个时期的研究特点和主要的高等教育组织治理模式进行回顾和评述。总体来看,美国高等教育组织治理模式经历了起源、封闭系统视角、开放系统的理性视角和开放系统的文化视角四个不同时期,呈现出从单一治理模式到多样化治理模式,从关注内部治理到关注外部环境的影响,从结构化的观点到非正式关系的视角等趋势。 Based on literature on governance of higher education in the United 5rates since tins paper divides the history of the research on America＇s governance of higher education organization into several stages and makes a review of the features of the research at each stage and comments on the major modes of the governance. On the whole, the governance has undergone four stages, namely the initial period, the closed system period and the rational open system period and the cultural open sys tem period. It has changed from a single mode to a diversified mode system, from a structuralized view to an angle of informal relationship and its focus has shifted from internal governance to the influence of the external environment.

作者屈潇潇陈正

机构地区国家教育行政学院

出处《高校教育管理》 CSSCI 2014年第1期103-108,共6页 Journal of Higher Education Management

基金中国机构编制管理研究会对外委托课题(2013YJHZX04)

关键词美国高等教育组织治理模式路径变迁 higher education organization mode of governance path transition

分类号 G649 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1Lee B. Campus Leaders and Campus Senates[J]. New Directions for Higher Education, 1991 (75) : 41 - 61.
2De Boer H, Ender J, Leisyte L. Public Sector Reform in Dutch Higher Education: The Organiza- tional Transformation of the University[J]. Public Administration, 2007(1) : 27 - 46.
3Sporn B. Governance and Administration: Organi- zational and Structural Trends [M] //Forest J, Alt- bach P. International Handbook of Higher Edu- cation. Dordreeht: Springer, 2006: 141.
4Weiek K. Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems[J]. Administrative Science Quar- terly, 1976(1) :1 - 19.
5Buckley F. Sociology and Modern Systems Theory [M]. London: Prentice-Hall, 1967: 241.
6Dill D. Faculty Participation in Policy Making [M]//Smart J. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon Press, 1988: 317-355.
7Yamada M. Joint Big Decision Committees and U- niversity Governance [M]//Birnbaum R. Faculty in Governance: the Role o J" Senates and Joint Committees in Academic Decision Making. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1991 : 79 - 95.
8Birnbaum R. The Latent Organizational Functions of the Academic Senate: Why Senates Do Not Work but Will Not Go Away? [M]//Birnbaum R. Fac-ulty in Governance: The Role of Senates and Joint Committees in Academic Decision Making. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991:7 - 25.
9Eckel P. The Role of Shared Governance in Insti- tutional Hard Decisions.. Enabler or Antagonist [J]. The Review of Higher Education, 2000(1) : 15 - 39.
10Minor J. Understanding Faculty Senates: Moving from Mystery to Models [J]. The Review of Higher Education, 2004(3) : 343 - 363.