期刊文献+

单晶和多晶陶瓷托槽与金属弓丝摩擦力的对比研究 被引量:3

Comparative study on frictional forces between monocrystal ceramic bracket and polycrystalline ceramic bracket when com- bined with arch-wires
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对单晶陶瓷托槽和多晶陶瓷托槽的摩擦力学性能进行初步测试,并与相同槽沟尺寸的金属托槽进行比较。方法使用万能材料力学实验机测试单晶陶瓷托槽、多晶陶瓷托槽及金属托槽与2种金属弓丝在弹力结扎圈结扎下的最大静摩擦力和平均动摩擦力。结果单晶及多晶陶瓷托槽与两种弓丝结合产生的摩擦力较金属托槽大,多晶陶瓷托槽的摩擦力较单晶陶瓷托槽的摩擦力大(P<0.05)。结论单晶陶瓷托槽与金属弓丝的摩擦力较多晶陶瓷托槽小,但较金属托槽大。 Objective A preliminary test was to be performed to test the friction properties of monocrystal ceramic bracket and poly- crystalline ceramic bracket compared with metal bracket of the same size. Methods The maximum static friction force and the average dynamic friction of monocrystal ceramic bracket, polycrystalline ceramic bracket and metal bracket combined with two kinds of metal arch-wires were tested by a universal testing machine. Results The friction produced by the combination of monocrystal ceramic brack- et or polycrystalline ceramic bracket with two kinds of arch-wires was greater than the metal bracket. The metal bracket badsmallestfric- tional forceofthree kinds of brackets. The monoerystal ceramic bracket had smaller frictional force than polycrystalline ceramic bracket. Conclusions The frictional force of monoerystal ceramic bracket and arch-wires is smaller than that of polycrystalline ceramic bracket, but is greater than that of metal bracket combined with arch-wires.
出处 《口腔医学》 CAS 2013年第12期821-823,共3页 Stomatology
基金 江苏省医学领军人才与创新团队项目(LJ201110) 南京市医学科技发展专项资金(YKK12123)
关键词 单晶陶瓷托槽 多晶陶瓷托槽 摩擦力 monocrystal ceramic bracket polycrystalline ceramic bracket frictional force
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献87

共引文献21

同被引文献42

  • 1郭杰.临床结扎力量与口内托槽沿不锈钢弓丝滑动的摩擦力[J].国外医学(口腔医学分册),2004,31(4):328-328. 被引量:1
  • 2林和平,吴建勇.弓丝与结扎方法对摩擦力影响的实验研究[J].上海口腔医学,2005,14(2):164-168. 被引量:6
  • 3刘松英,房伯君,王霞.正畸托槽材料及其相关性能的研究进展[J].辽宁医学杂志,2006,20(2):114-115. 被引量:4
  • 4李明华,刘晓秋,孙宏晨,杨海滨.氧化锆陶瓷在口腔医学中的应用[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2006,32(6):1146-1148. 被引量:8
  • 5Kusy RP. Ongoing innovations in biomechanics and materials for the new millennium[J]. Angle Orthod, 2000,70 (5) : 366-376.
  • 6Yamaguchi K, Nanda RS, Morimoto N, et al. A study of force application, amount of retarding force, and bracket width in sliding mechanics [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996,109(1) : 50-56.
  • 7Kapila S, Angolkar PV, Duneanson MG Jr, et al. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1990,98(2) : 117-126.
  • 8Arici N, Akdeniz BS, Arici S. Comparison of the frictional characteristics of aesthetic orthodontic brackets measured using a modified in vitro teehnique[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2015,45(1) :29-37.
  • 9Kumar BS, Miryala S, Kumar KK, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Friction Resistance of Titanium, Stainless Steel, Ceramic and Ceramic with Metal Insert Brackets with Varying Dimensions of Stainless Steel Wire: An In vitro Multi-center Study[J]. J Int Oral Health, 2014,6 (5) .. 66-71.
  • 10Tecco S,Festa F, Caputi S,et al. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model[J']. Angle Orthod, 2005,75(6) : 1041-1045.

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部