摘要
回顾和梳理"幸福悖论"的两种主要范式,在中国情景下对其进行验证与分析。研究资料源于2012年珠三角发达地区的问卷调查。研究结果发现:效用论和互动论两种范式均有较高的解释力,二者对解释不同收入群体的幸福获得模式存在显著差异:低收入群体的幸福获得更多源于收入水平的提高;中上收入群体的幸福获得则主要归结为社会互动的增加。
Reviewing two main paradigms of "happiness paradox", prove and analyze them in the Chinese context. The data is derived from the questionnaire survey in the developed area of Pearl River Delta in 2012. The results show that both utility paradigm and interaction paradigm can strongly explain happiness. However, there is great explanatory diversity of these two paradigms for the residents of different income level. For the low income group, their happiness mainly comes from income. For the middle and high in- come groups, their happiness mainly comes from social interaction.
出处
《安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期35-41,共7页
Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基金
教育部人文社会科学规划基金一般项目(10YJA840033)
中山大学"985工程"专项基金
中山大学三期"211"专项基金
中山大学笹川优秀青年奖学基金
关键词
幸福感
幸福悖论
效用论
互动论
happiness
happiness paradox
utility
interaction