期刊文献+

射频消融辅助下前入路右半肝切除术与传统右半肝切除术治疗肝脏中部肿瘤的对比研究 被引量:2

Radiofrequency ablation-assisted anterior approach right hepatectomy versus conventional right hepatectomy for central liver tumors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较射频消融(RFA)辅助下前入路右半肝切除术与传统右半肝切除术治疗肝脏中部肿瘤的疗效及安全性。方法:将60例肝脏中部肿瘤患者按照随机数字法均分为对照组与观察组。对照组行传统右半肝切除术,观察组行RFA辅助下前入路右半肝切除术。比较两组手术情况、住院时间、并发症发生率与5年生存率等。结果:两组在手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但观察组出血量、术中肿瘤破裂例数、术中大出血例数、输血例数及住院时间均明显少于对照组(均P<0.05);对照组总并发症发生率为46.67%,观察组为36.67%,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Kaplan-Meier分析显示对照组5年生存率43.09%,观察组为65.73%,两组差异有学意义(P<0.001)。结论:射频消融辅助下前入路右半肝切除术治疗肝脏中部肿瘤的效果显著,明显优于传统右半肝切除术。 Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety ofradiofrequency ablation (RFA)-assisted anterior approach right hepatectomy between conventional right liver resection for central liver tumors. Methods: Sixty patients with central liver tumor were equally designated, using random number table, to control group and observational group. Patients in control group underwent conventional right liver resection, and patients in observational group underwent RFA-assisted anterior approach hepatectomy. The intraoperative conditions, length of postoperative hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications and S-year survival between the two groups were compared. Results: There was no statistical difference in operative time between the two groups (P〉0.05), however, the intraoperative blood loss, the number of cases with intraoperative tumor rupture and massive haemorrhage,the number of cases requiring blood transtusion and length of postoperative hospital stay were significantlyreduced in observational group compared with control group (all P〈0.0S). The overall incidence of postoperative complications in control group and observational group was 46.67% and 36.67% respectively, and the difference between them had statistical significance (P〉0.0S). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the S-year survival rate in control group and observational group was 43.09% and 65.73% respectively, and the difference between them was statistically significant (P〈0.001). Conclusion: RFA-assisted anterior approach right hepatectomy has demonstrable efficacy in treatment of central liver tumors, and is superior to the conventional right liver resection.
作者 谷星
出处 《中国普通外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期18-21,共4页 China Journal of General Surgery
关键词 肝肿瘤 肝切除术 射频消融术 Liver Neoplasms Hepatectomy Radio frequency Ablation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献121

共引文献68

同被引文献27

  • 1许秋然,郑鑫,姚英民,杨威,刘青光.肝移植术与肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的meta分析[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2012,33(5):576-582. 被引量:7
  • 2Wong TC, Lo CM. Resection strategies for hepatocel|ular carcinomaEJ3. Semin l.iver Dis, 2013,33 (3) : 273-281.
  • 3Wang CC, Jawade K, Yap AQ, et al. Resection of large hcpatocellular carcinoma using the combination of liver hanging maneuver and anterior approach[J]. World J Surg, 2010,34 (8) : 1874-1878.
  • 4I.iu CL, Fan ST, Cheung ST, et al. Anterior approach versus conventional approach right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled study:J3. Ann Surg,2006,244(2) : 194-203.
  • 5Duan YF,Li XD,Sun DL,et al.A preliminary study on surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal hypertension[J].Am J Surg,2015,210(1):129-133.
  • 6Inoue H,Emori K,Toyonaga A,et al.Long term results of balloonoccluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for portosystemic shunt encephalopathy in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension[J].Kurume J,2014,61(1):1-8.
  • 7Berzigotti A,Reig M,Abraldes JG,et al.Portal hypertension and the outcome of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in compensated cirrhosis:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Hepatology,2015,61(2):36-526.
  • 8蒋锋.探究奥曲肽联合前列地尔治疗肝硬化合并肝肾综合征的疗效[J].医药前沿,2014,4(36):220-221.
  • 9樊嘉,周俭,吴志全,汤钊猷,周信达,马曾辰,钦伦秀,王征.原发性肝癌的外科治疗:20年7566例的临床经验[J].中华消化外科杂志,2009,8(2):99-102. 被引量:58
  • 10杨甲梅,谢峰.肝切除术中肝血流阻断方法的选择[J].中国普通外科杂志,2009,18(7):657-660. 被引量:35

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部