期刊文献+

直肠指检对中低位直肠癌术前评估意义的临床分析

Clinical significance of digital rectal examination for preoperative assessment in mid-low rectal cancers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨直肠指检在直肠癌术前评估中的临床意义。方法前瞻性纳入132例中低位直肠癌患者行直肠指检,判断肿瘤下缘距肛缘距离、浸润肠壁周径长度、大体类型及浸润深度指标,分析上述指标与术后病理判断的准确率以及与淋巴结转移率的关系。结果直肠指检对中低位直肠癌肿瘤下缘距肛缘距离3~8cm准确率为63.63%~94.12%;对环周度判断准确率为82.86%~88.00%;大体类型准确率为80.00%~88.45%;对浸润深度判断准确率为75.00%~86.27%。单因素分析显示,淋巴结转移率与环周度、大体类型及浸润深度均有相关性。多因素分析显示,大体类型及浸润深度是影响淋巴结转移的独立因素。结论直肠指检对中低位直肠癌术前评估具有重要临床意义。 【Objective】To assess the value of the digital examination for mid-low rectal cancer before operation. 【Methods】132 patients diagnosed as rectal cancer were prospectively enrolled into this study. All patients were performed digital examination to assess the distance from tumor's inferior border to anal, the infiltration depth, the macroscopic pathology and the circulus degree. Then the results were compared with the pathologic assessing and the lymph node positive rate. 【Results】Digital examination had an excellent accuracy rate for the distance from mid-low rectal cancer's(3~8 cm) inferior border to anal(63.63%~94.12%), circulus(82.86%~88.00%), macroscopic pathology(80.00%~88.45%) and the infiltration depth(75.00%~86.27%), respectively. Univariate analysis demon- strated that the circulus, macroscopic pathology and the infiltration depth influenced the lymph node positive rate. Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated macroscopic pathology and the infiltration depth were independent lymph node metastasis factors【.Conclusion】Digital examination for mid-low rectal cancer before operation has an important clinical significance.
作者 张宪 金星林
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第33期71-74,共4页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 直肠指检 直肠癌 中低位 淋巴转移 digital examination rectal cancer mid-low lymph node metastasis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献71

  • 1靳明林,石彦,蔡志民.结直肠癌与淋巴结转移关系的研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2003,25(13):1194-1196. 被引量:5
  • 2蔡宏,莫善兢,王亚农,朱蕙燕,师英强,董锐增,施达仁,陆红芬.早期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的基础和临床研究[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(5):273-277. 被引量:19
  • 3全国大肠癌病理研究协作组.全国大肠癌病理研究统一规范[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1986,8:156-156.
  • 4[1]Lindmark G,Gerdin B,Pahlman L,Bergstrom R,Glimelius B.Prognostic predictors in colorectal cancer.Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:1219-1227
  • 5[2]Moriya Y,Sugihara K,Akasu T,Fujita S.Patterns of recurrence after nerve-sparing surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma with special reference to loco-regional recurrence.Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:1162-1168
  • 6[3]Heriot AG,Hicks RJ,Drummond EG,Keck J,Mackay J,Chen F,Kalff V.Does positron emission tomography change management in primary rectal cancer? A prospective assessment.Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:451-458
  • 7[4]Dobos N,Rubesin SE.Radiologic imaging modalities in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer.Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2002; 16:875-895
  • 8[5]Ahmad NA,Kochman ML,Ginsberg GG.Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal cancers and villous adenomas.Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2002; 16:897-906
  • 9[6]Brown G,Davies S,Williams GT,Bourne MW,Newcombe RG,Radcliffe AG,Blethyn J,Dallimore NS,Rees BI,Phillips CJ,Maughan TS.Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer:digital rectal examination,endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging? Br J Cancer 2004; 91:23-29
  • 10[7]Gagliardi G,Bayar S,Smith R,Salem RR.Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with external phase-arrayed coils.Arch Surg 2002; 137:447-451

共引文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部