期刊文献+

全球化背景下调解制度法律文化研究

Legal and Cultural Studies on Mediation under the Background of Globalization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以和谐为特征的调解方式在中国长期运用,从法理角度不乏弊端,但却日益为西方所接受和发展。调解制度与诉讼在性质、程序和文化等方面存在着重大区别,但调解的社会和法律效果已得到证实,除法律制度因素以外,调解中的文化因素影响不容忽视,个人主义文化与集体主义文化,外向型文化与内生型文化,单一型文化与多重型文化,高权力距离指数文化与低权力距离指数文化都会对调解的效果产生重要影响。对跨国文化的了解、沟通和认同都是有效调解的因素。全球化背景下,以调解制度为代表的多元纠纷解决机制将会复兴。 Mediation based on the harmony has been used tages from the perspective of jury; however, it has been graduall in China for a long time although there are some disadvan- y accepted and developed by the westerners. Mediation and litigation have differences in the nature, application, and culture legal aspects, but social and legal effect of mediation has been confirmed. In addition to the legal mechanism, culture factors may have important influence on the effects of mediation, including individualism and collectivism, extroverted culture and endogenous culture, unitary and multiple culture, low power distance and high PDI distance culture. Understanding and identity of international culture is effective to media- tion. Multi-dispute-settlement mechanism represented by mediation will revive under the background of globalization.
作者 乔治 凌萍萍
出处 《四川理工学院学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第6期86-91,共6页 Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJC820070)
关键词 调解制度 法律文化 文化认同 纠纷解决机制 权力距离指数 mediation system legal culture cultural identity dispute resolution mechanism power distance index(PDI)
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1布拉德斯潘格勒,综合利益考量的谈判[EB/OL].[2013-08-01].http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/interest-based_bargaining.
  • 2See generally Kevin Avrucb, Culture and Conflict Resolution [M].United States Institute of peace press,1998.
  • 3Edward Brunet,Charles Craver,Ellen E.Deason,Altemative Dispute Resolution:The Advocate's Perspective(3rd ed.)[M]. Lexis Nexis,2006:228-245.
  • 4季卫东.法律程序的意义[M]//季卫东.法治秩序的建构.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:31-32.
  • 5Kevin Avruch & Peter W.Black,Ideas of Human Nature in Contemporary conflict resolution theory,6 Negotiation [J]. Conciliation Quarterly,1990,(14):221.
  • 6Hiram E.Chodosh,Reforming Judicial keform Inspired by U.S. Models[M].DePaul L.Rev,2002.
  • 7Ellen E.Deason,Procedural Rules for Complementary Systems of Litigation and Mediation Worldwide []].Notre Dame Law Review,2004:80.
  • 8Dr.Luis Miguel Diaz & Nancy A.Oretskin J.D., "Mediation furthers the principles of transparency and cooperation to solve disputes in the NAFTA Free Trade Area" [J].Denver Journal of Intl.Law and Policy,2001,(30):35.
  • 9徐元彪,周茜.国内调解制度与国际调解制度之应用分析与比较[J].广西社会科学,2006(8):91-94. 被引量:2
  • 10Hiram E.Chodosh,supra note 39 citing Albie Sachs[M].Soft Vengeance of a Freedom Fighter,2000.

二级参考文献110

共引文献144

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部