论金在权的条件还原主义及其理论困境——基于因果排斥性问题的讨论

On Kim's Conditional Reductionism and Its Dilemma——Basing on the Discussion of Causal Exclusion Problem

金在权首先提出用以支撑因果排斥性问题的随附性论证。该论证揭露了非还原物理主义蕴含的内在矛盾。同时,金在权论证认为,条件还原主义可以成为融洽解决因果排斥性问题的还原物理主义形式。然而,作为具备极为弱化的物理主义立场的条件还原主义而言,它能否……自洽地解决因果排斥性问题依然值得讨论,因为用以支撑因果排斥性问题的随附性论证本身蕴含着强物理主义立场。

Jaegwon Kim firstly developed the Supervenience Argument to sustain the Causal Exclusion Problem ,which suggested some inner contradicitons in nonreductive physicalism. And kim also argued that the conditional reduetionism as a mode of reductive physicalism that can harmoniously solve Causal Exclusion Problem. However, whether conditional reductionism, which have a pretty week physicalist position, can self- consistently solve the Causal Exclusion Problem are still in issue, because the supervenience argument that supports the Causal Exclusion Problem, involve a strong physicalist position.