期刊文献+

对布兰登基因选择批判的反思

Rethinking Brandon's Critiques to Genic Selectionism
原文传递
导出
摘要 布兰登是知名生物学哲学家。他对基因选择提出了两个批评,其一为"屏蔽原则",其二为"遗传漂变"批评。"屏蔽原则"认为,自然选择直接作用的对象是高层次实体,而不是基因层次实体。此批评无效,因为基因选择论者从未否认这一点,他们仅强调自然选择的最终作用单位是基因。而"遗传漂变"批评则认为基因型层次对于自然选择的描述在经验上优于基因层次。此批评仍然无效,因为布兰登误用了"遗传漂变"的概念。 Robert Brandon is a wellknown philosopher of biology. He raised two critiques to genic selecfionism, one is the screeningoff criterion, and the other is the genetic drift critique. Screeningoff criterion argues that natural selection directly operates on higher level entities, rather than genie level entities. This critique fails because genie seleetionists never deny this point, and they only claim that natural selection ultimately works on genes. Genetic drift critique argues that a description at the genotypic level is empirically better than a description at the genie level. This critique al so fails because Brandon misuses the concept of genetic drift.
作者 陈勃杭 王巍
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期35-39,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金一般项目"特殊科学哲学前沿研究"资助 项目批准号11BZXO21
关键词 布兰登 基因选择 屏蔽原则 遗传漂变批评 Brandon Genie Selectionism Screening-off criterion Genetic drift Critique
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Wilson R A.2007. Levels of selection[CYI Matthen M, Stephens C. Philosophy of biology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007:141-162.
  • 2陈勃杭,王巍.追问“基因选择”[J].哲学分析,2013,4(2):147-154. 被引量:2
  • 3Sterelny K, Kitcher P. The return of the gene[J]. TheJournal of Philosophy, 1988,85(7): 339-361.
  • 4Brandon R. The levels of selection[C]//PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Associa?tion. Philosophy of Science Association, 1982: 315-323.
  • 5Sober E, Wilson D S. A critical review of philosophical work on the units of selection problem[J]. Philosophy of Science, 1994: 534-555.
  • 6Dawkins R. The extended phenotype[M]. Revised edition. Ox?ford: Oxford University Press, 1999,238.
  • 7Brandon R N, Nijhout H F. The Empirical Nonequivalence of Genic and Genotypic Models of Selection: A(Decisive) Refutation of Genic Selectionism and Pluralistic Genic Selectionism[J]. Philosophy of Science, 2006, 73(3): 277-297.
  • 8Strickberger M W. Evolution[M](3rd). Sudbury:Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2000.534-537.
  • 9Sober E, Lewontin R C. Artifact, cause and genic selection[J]. Philosophy of science, 1982: 157-1800.
  • 10Weinberger N. Is There an Empirical Disagreement between Genic and Genotypic Selection Models? A Response to Brandon and Nijhout[J]. Philosophy of Science, 2011, 78(2): 225-237.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Samir Okasha.The “averaging fallacy” and the levels of selection[J].Biology and Philosophy.2004(2)
  • 2Dawkins,R.Replicator selection and the extended phenotype[].Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie.1978
  • 3Reeve,H.K.,Keller,L.,Keller,L.Levels of Selection: Burying the Units-of-Selection Debate and Unearthing the Crucial New Issues[].Levels of Selection in Evolution.1999
  • 4Sinclair J,Brazil D.Teacher Talk[]..1982
  • 5Midgley,M.Gene Juggling[].Philosophy.1979
  • 6Waters,C.K.Tempered Realism about the Forces of Selection[].Philosophy of Science.1991
  • 7R.Dawkins."Replicators and vehicles"[].GenesOrganismsPopulations:Controversies over the Units of Selec-tion.1982
  • 8Charlesworth,Deborah,Willis,John H."The genetics of inbreeding depression"[].Nature Reviews Genetics.2009
  • 9R.Dawkins.TheExtendedPhe-notype[]..1982
  • 10R.Dawkins.TheSelfishGene,30thanniversaryedition[]..2006

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部