期刊文献+

重庆市卫生资源优先级配置态度调查:优先项目与决策标准 被引量:2

Surveying the attitudes toward health resource priority allocation in Chongqing in view of priority projects and prioritize criteria
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解重庆市卫生局行政人员对重庆市卫生资源优先级配置的优先项目和优先决策标准的态度。方法:采用问卷调查,对89位重庆市卫生局公务员展开调查。结果:摸清省级卫生行政机关行政人员决策偏好,包括卫生资源优先项目的优先程度顺位及决策标准的重要程度顺位。结论:省级卫生厅的管理人员对公共卫生项目的优先度和重视程度较高,对上级机关决策依从性较强,开展卫生资源配置能充分结合本地的实际情况。 Objective To investigate the attitude of administrative staffs from Chongqing Health Bureau towards health re-source priority allocation in Chongqing. Methods 89 cases of civil servants in Chongqing Municipal Health Bureau were surveyed with questionnaire. Results The preferences of decision-making of administrative staffs in provincial health administration were ob- tained, including the priorities of projects of health resource and importance of decision criteria. Conclusion Administrative staffs in provincial health administration attach more importance to public health projects, who have strong compliance with decision- making authority, and fully consider the local situation while carrying out health resources allocation.
出处 《中国卫生事业管理》 北大核心 2014年第1期31-34,共4页 Chinese Health Service Management
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"卫生资源优先次序分配的伦理机制及评价研究"(项目编号:13CZX082) 重庆市决策咨询与管理创新一般项目"城乡统筹背景下的重庆卫生资源优先级配置研究"(编号:CSTC 2013jccxA0225)
关键词 卫生资源 优先级配置 优先项目 优先决策标准 health resource priority allocation priority projects prioritize criteria.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1托马斯·戴伊.理解公共政策(第12版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:55-89.
  • 2Nancy M. Baum. Resource allocation in public health practice[ D]. PHD dissertation in The University of Michigan,2010:6 - 8.
  • 3Mays,G. Organization of the Public Health Delivery System [ A ]. In Novick ,L. ,Morrow,C. and Mays, G. ( eds. ) Public Health Adminis- tration. Principles for Population - Based Management (2ned) [ M ]. Sudbury:Jones and Bartlett. 2008.
  • 4Nancy M. Baum. Resource allocation in public health practice:a na- tional survey of local public health officials[ J]. J Public Health Man- ag Pract,2011,17(3) :265 -274.
  • 5峗怡,贺加.我国医疗改革进程中卫生资源分配的公平性研究--基于合理问责框架的分析[J].道德与文明,2012(6):120-125. 被引量:4

二级参考文献22

  • 1龚向光,胡善联.卫生资源配置的公平性分析[J].中华医院管理杂志,2005,21(2):73-77. 被引量:92
  • 2Martin D. , Singer P. , A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Health Care Institutions. Health Care Analysis, 2003, 11(1).
  • 3Maluka S. , amuzora P. K. , Sebastifin M, et al. Decen- tralized Health Care Priority-setting in Tanzania: Evaluating against the Accountability for Reasonableness Framework. Social Science & Medicine,2010,71 (4).
  • 4Gibson J. , Mitton C. , Martin D. , Ethics and Econom- ics: Does Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis Contribute to Fair Priority Setting? Journal of Health Services Research & Poll cy, 2006,(11).
  • 5Daniels N. ,Sabin J. E.. Setting Limits Fairly : Can We Learn to Share Medical Resources? Oxford, UK: Oxford Universi ty Press,2002,pp. 25 46.
  • 6Kenny N., Giacomini M.. Wanted~ A New Ethic Field for Health Policy Analysis. Health Care Analysis, 2005,1: (4).
  • 7[美]富兰德,等.卫生经济学[M].于保荣,等,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:508-513.
  • 8Hasman A. , Holm S.. Accountability for Reasonable- ness: Opening the Black Box of Process. Health Care Anal, 2005 Dec,13(4).
  • 9Norman D. , Sabin J. E.. Accountability {or Reasona bleness:an Update. BMJ ,2008, 337 :a1850.
  • 10Norman D.. Accountability for Reasonableness: Estab lishing a Fair Process for Priority Setting Is Easier than Agreeing on Principles, BMJ. 2000,321 : 1300 - 1301.

共引文献3

同被引文献24

  • 1Murray C, Frenk J. A Framework for Assessing the Perform- ance of Health Systems [ J ]. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000, 78(6): 717-731.
  • 2Pierre J, Peters G B. Governing complex societies: Trajecto- ries and scenarios [ M ]. Basingstoke : Palgrave MacMillan, 2005.
  • 3Travis P, Egger D, Davies P, et al. Towards better steward- ship : concepts and critical issues [ C ]. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Papers, 2002.
  • 4Baltussen R. Priority setting of public spending in developing countries:do not try to do everything for everybody [ J]. Health Policy, 2006, 78(2-3) : 149-156.
  • 5Clark S, Weale A. Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework [ J ]. Journal of health organization and management, 2012, 26(3): 293-316.
  • 6Hauck K, Smith P C, Goddard M. The Economics of Priori- ty Setting for Health Care : A Literature Review [ R ]. HNP discussion paper, 2003.
  • 7Smith N, Mitton C, Peacock S, et al. Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers [ J ]. BMC Health Serv- ices Research, 2009, 9: 165.
  • 8Sibbald S L, Singer P A, Upshur R, et al. Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for suc- cessful priority setting [ J ]. BMC Health Service Research, 2009, 9: 43.
  • 9Kapiriri L, Bondy S J. Health practitioners' and health planners' information needs and seeking behavior for decision making in Uganda [ J ]. International Journal of Medical In- formatics, 2006, 75(10-11): 714-721.
  • 10Mooney G, Wiseman V. Burden of disease and priority set- ting[ J ]. Health Economics, 2000, 9 (5) : 369-372.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部