期刊文献+

电压暂降严重程度及其测度、不确定性评估方法 被引量:80

Voltage Sag Severity and Its Measure and Uncertainty Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 电压暂降是电力系统不可避免的严重电能质量问题。总结电压暂降严重程度评价指标和评估方法;结合源、网、荷各侧电压暂降严重程度的影响因素、危害程度、特征与要求,分析暂降严重程度的内涵和评价测度存在条件,根据其不同层面的物理和数学特性,从多角度提出暂降严重程度评价的指标体系;以设备与过程电压暂降免疫力以及相关标准等为基础,归纳总结基于不确定性理论与不确定性测度的暂降严重程度评价思路和方法,并指出了值得深入研究的内容。 Voltage sag is an inevitable serious problem in power system. This paper gave an overview of voltage sag severity, including its evaluation index and method. With the influencing factors, damage degree, the characteristics and requirements of severity in the power source-network-load sides, intension and evaluation measure existence conditions of sag severity were analyzed. According to the physical and mathematical properties of its different levels, the evaluation index system of voltage sag severity from multi-angle was presented. From current related standards about equipment and process voltage sag immunity, this paper made summarization on the thought and method of severity research based on uncertainty theory and uncertainty measure, for the purpose of pointing out worthy study in the future.
出处 《中国电机工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期644-658,共15页 Proceedings of the CSEE
基金 基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(50877049) 国家863高技术基金项目(CRI2012RCPS00998NN-1) 四川省科技支撑计划(2013GZ0062) 国家教育部博士点基金资助项目(20130181110004)~~
关键词 电压暂降 严重程度 评估方法 指标体系 不确定性理论 测度 voltage sag severity evaluation method index system uncertainty theory measure
  • 相关文献

参考文献148

  • 1Beaulieu G, Bollen M H.J, Malgarotti S, Ball R, CIGRE Working group 36-07 members. Power quality indices and objectives ongoing activities in CIGRE WG 36-07[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution Conference. Chicago, 1L, United states, 2002.
  • 2Bollen M H J. Understanding power quality problems: voltage sags and interruptions[M]. New Jersey: John Wiley&Sons, Inc, 2000: 1-34.
  • 3Dettloff A. Power quality performance component of the special manufacturing contracts between energy provider and customer[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution Conference. Seattle, WA, United states, 2000.
  • 4Ohrstrom M, Soder L. A comparison of two methods used for voltage dip characterization[C]//2003 IEEE Bologna PowerTech Conference. Bologna, Italy, 2003.
  • 5Gosbell V J, Perera S, Barr R, Baitch A. Primary and secondary indices for power quality(PQ) survey reporting[C]//1 lth International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power. Lake Placid, NY, United states, 2004.
  • 6Lu C N, Shen C C. Voltage sag immunity factor considering severity and duration[C]//IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting. Denver, CO, United states, 2004.
  • 7Wang J, Chen S, Lie T T. Estimating economic impact of voltage sags[C]//International Conference on Power System Technology, POWERCON. Singapore, 2004.
  • 8Lee G J, Albu M, Heydt G T. A power quality index based on equipment sensitivity, cost and network vulnerability [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2004, 19(3): 1504-1510.
  • 9Guasch L, C6rcoles F, Pedra J. Effects of symmetrical and unsymmetrical voltage sags on induction machines [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2004, 19(2): 774-782.
  • 10肖世杰.构建中国智能电网技术思考[J].电力系统自动化,2009,33(9):1-4. 被引量:595

二级参考文献527

共引文献1902

同被引文献654

引证文献80

二级引证文献387

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部