期刊文献+

国内外液化判别方法比较及实例分析

State of the Art Review of Liquefaction Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在工程建设中,液化判别对于优化工程设计与投资具有重要意义,结合某工程实例,比较了中国规范和欧美地区通行的简化Seed法对于同样场地的液化判别结果,结果显示,在细粒含量较高的粉性土液化地区,规范法的液化判别结果要明显高于简化Seed法。 The liquefaction potential of a construction site has significant impact of the optimization design and the capital in vestment. This paper presents a state of the art review of the liquefaction evaluation of a site. The code method and simplified Seed method are used to evaluate the same site. The results indicate that a higher liquefaction potential evaluated by the code approach in higher fine content in silty soils, compared with the Simplified Seed method.
作者 周骏
机构地区 华东电力设计院
出处 《土工基础》 2013年第6期84-86,共3页 Soil Engineering and Foundation
关键词 液化判别 规范法 简化Seed法 Liquefaction Evaluation Code Method Simplified Seed Method
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1Seed H B,Idriss I M.Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential[].Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division ASCE.1971
  • 2Iwasaki T,T Arakawa,K.Tokida.Simplified Procedures for Assessing Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes[].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Conference.1982

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部