期刊文献+

微创经皮肾穿刺碎石术(MPCNL)治疗上尿路结石的临床分析 被引量:2

Clinical Analysis of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Upper Urinary Calculi
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨微创经皮肾穿刺碎石术(MPCNL)用于治疗尿路结石的临床效果。方法:选取120例单侧上尿路结石病患者,随机分为两组,每组60人。一组应用微创经皮肾穿刺碎石术(MPCNL)进行一期单通道上尿路取石,另一组采用开放手术治疗。比较并分析两组患者的临床疗效。结果:应用MPCNL治疗的60名患者中,结石清除的有55名,清除率为91.17%,手术时间平均为77分钟,住院时间平均为5.3天。术中平均出血100 mL,术后发生大出血者一例,经输血后好转,术后发热者38例,发热比例为63.3%,尿液转清时间平均为2.5天。应用开放式手术的60名患者中,结石清除的有39例,清除率为65.0%,平均手术之间为112分钟,住院时间平均为18.1天,术中平均出血380 mL,术后发生大出血者9例,经输血后好转,术后发热者43例,发热比例为71.2%,尿液转清时间平均为8.6天。结论:MPCNL方法治疗上尿路结石的效果明显比开放式手术好,具有清除率高、手术时间短、术后并发症少、术后感染少以及患者恢复快的优点。 Objective: To discuss the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous renal biopsy lithotripsy (MPCNL) on the treatment of urinary stones. Methods: 120 cases with unilateral urinary stones who were treated in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 60 patients in each group. 60 cases were treated with the minimally invasive percutaneous renal puncture lithotripsy (MPCNL) for a period of single channel urinary lithotomy, while another 60 patients were treated by open surgery. Then the clinical efficacy of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: Among the 60 patients who were treated by MPCNL, 55 of them were removed and the clearance rate was 91.17%, the average time of surgery was 77 min, and the hospitalization was 5.3 days on average, the mean volume of bleeding was 100 mL during operation, one case was complicated with severe bleeding after proce- dure and with blood transfusion and changed into open surgery. 38 cases showed fever after operation and the rate was 63.3%. The aver- age time of blood urine was 2.5 days. In the 60 patients who has treated by opened operation, the stone clearance rate was 65.0%, the mean operative duration was 112minutes, the average hospital stay was 18.1 days, the average volume of bleeding was 380 mL during operation, 9 cases were complicated with severe bleeding after operation and with blood transfusion, 43 cases were fever after operation and the rate was 71.2%, the average time of blood urine was 8.6 days. Conclusion: High clearance rate, short operation time, less post- operative complications, patients with less postoperative infection and recovery fast are the merits of MPCNL whose effect is obviously better than open surgery.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2013年第34期6707-6710,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30872464)
关键词 微创经皮肾穿刺碎石术(MPCNL) 上尿路结石 治疗 MPCNL Calculus in upper urinary The treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Kumar S, Kurdia KC, Ganesamoni R, et al. Randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of naffopidil and tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy in combination with prednisolone for distal ureteral stones[J]. Korean J Urol, 2013, 05(5):311-315.
  • 2Aboumarzouk OM, Somani B, Monga M. Safety and efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for stone disease in obese patients: a system- atic review of the literature [J]. BJU lnt,2012, 110(8 Pt B):374-380.
  • 3刘功海,吴世东,曾国华,欧长伟,范翰文,何小鹏.布比卡因局部阻滞治疗输尿管结石所致肾绞痛60例的临床观察[J].现代生物医学进展,2012,12(4):704-706. 被引量:4
  • 4Yin X, Tang Z, Yu B, et al. Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Distal Ureteral Calculi: A Meta-Analysis [J]. J Endourol,2013, 27(4):408-414.
  • 5敖炜群,孙静,吴宗林,刘军,吴瑜,彭志清,李飞飞.个体化低剂量CT尿路造影在诊断输尿管结石中的应用[J].现代生物医学进展,2012,12(13):2531-2534. 被引量:8
  • 6Razzaghi MR, Razi A, Mazloomfard MM, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Pneumatic Lithotripters Versus Holmium Laser in Management of Ureteral Calculi: A Randomized Clinical trial [J]. Urol J,2013, 10(1): 762-766.
  • 7Ciuta C, Nechifor V, Tomac I, et al. Lyme disease - unusual medical encounter for an urologist [J].Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi,2012, 10;116(4): 1101-1105.
  • 8Lee SH, Kim TH, Myung SC, et al. Effectiveness of flexible uretero- scopic stone removal for treating ureteral and ipsilateral renal stones: a single-center experience[J]. Korean J Urol,2013, 06;54(6):377-382.
  • 9Manoj Monga, William W, Beeman Bsc, et al. Advanced intrarenal ureterosocopic procedures [J]. Urologic Clinics of North American, 2004, 31(1):129-135.
  • 10Preminger Gm, Assimos Dg, Lingeman Je, et al. AUA guideline on management of staghom calculi diagnosis and treatment recommen- dations[J]. J Urol, 2005, 73(6): 1991-2000.

二级参考文献24

  • 1孙西钊,叶章群.肾绞痛诊断和治疗新概念[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(5):321-323. 被引量:149
  • 2高建华,孙宪昶,李剑颖,李娜,夏庆堂,赵雯,戴汝平.不同前置滤线器对64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像质量及放射剂量影响的对照研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(8):858-861. 被引量:51
  • 3Williamson A,Hogga~B.Pain:a review of three commonly usedpain rating scales[J].J Clin Nurs,2005,14(7):798-804.
  • 4Heid F,Jage J.The treatment of pain in urology[J].BJU Int,2002,90(5):481-488.
  • 5Khalifa MS.Sharkawi MA.Treatment of pain owing to acuteureteral obstruction th pro-staglandin-synthetase inhibitor:a prospec-tive randomized study[J].J Urol,1986,136(2):393.
  • 6Gutman M,Braf Z.Kaver I,et al.The role of the radionu-eliderenal study in the management of renal colic[J].Br J Urol,1993,71:503.
  • 7Sarcletti M,Petter A,Romani N,et al.Pyuria in patients treatedwith indinavir is associated with renal dysfunction[J].Clin Nephrol,2000,54:261.
  • 8Honeck P,Hacker A,Alken P,et al.Shock wave lithotripsy versusureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi:a prospective study[J].UrolRes,2006,34:190-192.
  • 9El-Assmy A,El-Nahas A R,Mohsen T,et al.Extracorporeal sho-ck wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi in patients with cyst-ectomy and urinary diversion[J].Urology,2005,66:510-513.
  • 10Anagnostou T,Tolley D.Management of ureteric stones[J].EurUrol,2004,45:714-721.

共引文献9

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部