摘要
文章基于已有研究,针对我国企业环境管理自组织机制培育动力,从原动力、外部软驱动力、内部动力子系统和生态与环境价值观的塑造等方面进行了反思。文章通过与环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)的对比思考,确认了实现我国企业环境管理整体朝向自组织即意味着实现环境库兹涅茨曲线这一"高山"的跨越。文章最后通过与环境绩优国家的对比思考,既验证了当前环境管理政策体系的演化趋势为综合化、丰富化,又解释了当前我国环境管理主导政策与环境绩优国家环境管理主导政策异同的根源。
Based on the existing research, the paper firstly reflected the problems from the source powers, external drive powers, internal power subsystems and ecological and environmental values according to the cultivating powers of corporate environmental management self-organization mechanism in China. Secondly, through the comparison with the EKC, the paper confirmed the result that China has stridden across the mountain of "EKC" when the corporate environmental management turned to self-organization. Thirdly, through the comparison with the countries of environmental optimal performance, the paper verified the trend of integration and enrichment about the current environmental management policy system. At the same time, the paper explained the roots of the differences about China's environmental management leading policies and the leading policies of the countries of environmental optimal performance.
出处
《改革与战略》
2014年第1期36-39,56,共5页
Reformation & Strategy
基金
教育部人文社科青年项目"环境政策综合化与企业环境管理自组织机制的培育与发展研究"(项目编号:09YJC790060)
广州市2013年软科学资助项目"可持续发展视野下广州市企业社会责任实现机制研究"(项目编号:13160009)
2013年广州医科大学骨干教师科研项目资助
关键词
可持续发展
企业环境管理
自组织机制
环境政策
环境库兹涅茨曲线
sustainable development
corporate environmental management
self-organization mechanism
environmental policy
EKC