期刊文献+

自平衡试验与传统试验的比对研究 被引量:6

Comparison study on self-balanced tests and the traditional tests
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文介绍了原位试验过程,对一根原型桩分别进行了自平衡试验、抗压试验和抗拔试验,抗压试验过程中测量了荷载箱在分级荷载下的荷载,同时用钢筋计测量了桩身应力,分析了自平衡试验与传统静载荷试验中极限承载力的差异,得到了自平衡承载力转换为抗压、抗拔承载力的转换系数。试验结果表明,上桩的抗压承载力最大,自平衡承载力次之,抗拔承载力最小;有桩端支撑时,桩侧承担的荷载增加了29.04%,说明增加桩端阻力可以增加桩侧摩阻力;在自平衡载荷试验和抗压试验均达到极限状态时,自平衡试验的荷载箱受力荷载大于抗压试验时的荷载,说明自平衡试验对应的极限端阻力大于抗压状态下的极限端阻力;上桩在没有端承条件下的抗压承载力与自平衡承载力相等,说明在相同端承条件下,上桩的自平衡摩阻力与抗压摩阻力不存在明显差异。 The in-situ testing processes of the prototype piles are introduced. The in-situ tests including the self-balanced test, the compression test and the uplift test for the same pile are carried out. In the process of the compression test, the compressive load of the load cell in the grading load is measured, and the stress of the pile body is measured with a steel bar meter at the same time. The differences of the limit bearing capacity between the self-balanced load test and the traditional static load test are analyzed, and the conversion coefficients for the self-balanced bearing capacity converting to the compressive bearing capacity and uplift bearing capacity are obtained. The results show that the compressive bearing capacity of piles is the maximum value, the self-balanced bearing capacity is the middle and the uplift bearing capacity is the minimum. Under the effect of the pile end support, the load borne by the pile side increases by 29.04% , which indicates that the increase of the pile end resistance can increase the pile friction resistance. When the self-balanced loading test and the compression test are in the limit state, the bearing load of the load cell under the balanced test is bigger than that under the compression test, which shows that the ultimate end resistance from the balanced test is bigger than that from the compressive resistance. When without the effect of the pile end support, the bearing capacity of the compressive piles and the bearing capacity of the self-balance piles are equal, which shows that in the same end bearing condition, there are not the significant differences for the self-balancing friction and the compression friction.
出处 《工程勘察》 2014年第1期11-16,共6页 Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying
基金 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金资助(HKY-JBYW-2011-11)
关键词 桩承载力 自平衡法 比对试验 等效转换 侧摩阻力 bearing capacity of pile self-balanced method comparison test equivalent conversion lateral friction resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献52

  • 1徐风云.桩承载力自平衡法的可靠性之质疑[J].公路,2004,49(7):12-19. 被引量:27
  • 2徐风云,黄文机.桩承载力自平衡法存在的几个关键问题[J].公路,2005,50(4):42-46. 被引量:21
  • 3王伯惠.评桩基测试自平衡法[J].公路,2005,50(7):24-32. 被引量:11
  • 4李广信 那向谦 等.土的本构关系研究的发展.建筑环境与结构工程最新发展[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,1995.190-209.
  • 5中华人民共和国行业标准.建筑基桩检测技采规范(JGJ106-2003)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
  • 6中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会.电力工程地基处理技术规程(DL/T5024-2005)[S].北京:中国电力出版社,2005.
  • 7中华人民共和国困家标准.混凝土结构设计规范(GB50010-2002)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
  • 8中华人民共和国国家标准.建筑地基基础设计规范(GB50007-2002)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
  • 9Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. FLAC^3D (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensions ) User Manuals. Version 2.1, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2002.
  • 10杨素春,方云飞.北京市勘察设计研究院.北京规范修订专题研究报告之六:后压浆灌注桩桩端、桩侧阻力研究[R].2006.

共引文献131

同被引文献60

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部