期刊文献+

妊娠期糖尿病新诊断标准对妊娠结局的意义 被引量:7

The significance of the new diagnostic code of GDM on the pregnancy outcome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨妊娠期糖尿病(gestational diabetes mellitus,GDM)新诊断标准实施前后1年对妊娠期糖尿病的诊断率、孕妇及围生儿临床结局的意义。方法收集我院执行新诊断标准前后一年的同年龄段、孕前体重指数(BMI)在正常范围即18.5≤BMI<23,孕前无内科合并症及不良妊娠史的产妇分为A组(2234例)和B组(2012例),分析GDM诊断率,孕产妇和围生儿并发症率方面有无差异。结果经新诊断标准纳入并治疗后,B组妊娠期高血压、羊水过多、巨大儿、新生儿低血糖发生率低于A组,P<0.01;B组切口感染、新生儿呼吸窘迫综合症也低于A组P<0.05;胎膜早破、产后出血及早产、死胎、胎儿生长受限差异无统计学意义,P>0.05。结论执行GDM新诊断标准指导临床血糖管理可以降低母儿并发症,且不会增加胎儿生长受限。 Objective To discuss the clinical result of maternal and fetus between the new diagnostic code of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) excution anterior-posterior one year, and change of diagnosis ratio. Methods According to the same age stage,range of BMI( 18.5 ≤ BMI 〈 23),without of complication of internal medicine and bad history of pregnancy before gesta- tion,we collected pregnant wowen beween January. 2009 and January. 2011 and classified into A group (2234cases) and B group (2012cases) by the two diagnostic code of GDM. The difference of GDM diagnosis ratio,complication of aternal and fetus were an- alyzed. Result Through diagnosis and treatment by new diagnostic code, the morbidity of PIH, polyhydramnios, fetal macroso- mia,hypoglycemia of newborn in B group were lower than those in A group (P 〈 0.01 ), the morbidity of postoperative infection, ARDS of newborn in B group were lower than those in A group too ( P 〈 0. 05 ), but the morbidity of PROM, postpartum hemor- rhage,premature labor,dead fetus,FGR had no statistically significant(P 〉 0.05). Conclusion To carry out the new diagnostic code of GDM and to guide managing blood glucose, that could decrease the complication of maternal and fetus, but could not in- crease the morbidity of FGR.
出处 《四川医学》 CAS 2013年第10期1491-1493,共3页 Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词 妊娠期糖尿病 2010年新诊断标准 并发症 gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) the new diagnostic code in 2010 complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010[J].{H}DIABETES CARE,2010,(01):11-61.
  • 2International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classifi cation of hyperglycemia in pregnancy[J].{H}DIABETES CARE,2010,(03):676-682.
  • 3杨慧霞.妊娠合并糖尿病对孕妇和围产儿的影响[J].中华医学信息导报,2005,20(3):14-14. 被引量:39
  • 4Cheung NW. Population health significance of gestational diabetes[J].{H}DIABETES CARE,2003,(07):2005-2009.
  • 5Kim C,Newton KM,Knopp RH. Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type2 diabetes:a systematic review[J].{H}DIABETES CARE,2002,(10):1862-1868.
  • 6HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes[J].{H}New England Journal of Medicine,2008,(19):1991-2002.

共引文献38

同被引文献72

引证文献7

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部